PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Safety of swine immunoglobulin as a substitute for human IVIG in dogs

By Strome, Sophie et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2026·Lake Forest Animal Hospital, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Pilot study on the safety of swine immunoglobulin in dogs as a substitute for human intravenous immunoglobulin.

Species:
dog
Dog vomitingStomach & digestionDogs

Plain-English summary

Three healthy female beagles were given swine immunoglobulin (SwIgG) to see if it could safely replace human intravenous immunoglobulin (hIVIG) for treating immune-related diseases. After one dog experienced vomiting following the injection, it was removed from the study, but the other two dogs tolerated the treatment well. One received a lower dose without issues, while the other had three doses and showed no adverse reactions. Blood tests showed some temporary changes that returned to normal within a week. This suggests that SwIgG could be a safe option for dogs, and more research is needed to explore its potential benefits for immune disorders.

People also search for: dog immune disease treatment · swine immunoglobulin for dogs · hIVIG alternatives for dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic strategies are needed to treat immune-mediated diseases in dogs. Human intravenous immunoglobulin (hIVIG), approved to treat inflammatory diseases in humans, has been used in dogs with some success in some immune-mediated hematologic and dermatologic disorders. However, cost, supply issues, and safety concerns have limited studies in dogs. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the feasibility of swine immunoglobulin G (SwIgG) in healthy dogs as a replacement for hIVIG. ANIMALS: Three healthy female beagles. METHODS: Swine IgG purified by column chromatography and injected SC into beagle dogs with or without intradermal injections at predetermined time points. The dogs were observed for up to 3 weeks with blood collected for clinical chemistry, hematology, and cytokine analysis. Clinical monitoring included heart rate, temperature, and respiratory rate. RESULTS: Injection of 1 dose (1 g/kg) of SwIgG resulted in vomiting after injection that resolved with treatment; no other clinical signs were observed over the 3-week period. One beagle that received a single dose of 0.2 g/kg SwIgG had a reaction and was removed from the second trial. The third beagle received 3 serial doses of 0.5 g/kg SwIgG with no adverse reaction throughout the 3-week period. Clinical chemistry in all dogs indicated slight increase in creatine kinase activity, C-reactive protein concentration, and aspartate aminotransferase activity which returned to normal by day 7 postinjection. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: It is feasible to use SwIgG in dogs and additional studies to investigate its use as an adjunctive treatment for immune-mediated disorders are warranted.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41883212/