Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Safety of swine immunoglobulin as a substitute for human IVIG in dogs
By Strome, Sophie et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2026·Lake Forest Animal Hospital, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Pilot study on the safety of swine immunoglobulin in dogs as a substitute for human intravenous immunoglobulin.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
Three healthy female beagles were given swine immunoglobulin (SwIgG) to see if it could safely replace human intravenous immunoglobulin (hIVIG) for treating immune-related diseases. After one dog experienced vomiting following the injection, it was removed from the study, but the other two dogs tolerated the treatment well. One received a lower dose without issues, while the other had three doses and showed no adverse reactions. Blood tests showed some temporary changes that returned to normal within a week. This suggests that SwIgG could be a safe option for dogs, and more research is needed to explore its potential benefits for immune disorders.
People also search for: dog immune disease treatment · swine immunoglobulin for dogs · hIVIG alternatives for dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic strategies are needed to treat immune-mediated diseases in dogs. Human intravenous immunoglobulin (hIVIG), approved to treat inflammatory diseases in humans, has been used in dogs with some success in some immune-mediated hematologic and dermatologic disorders. However, cost, supply issues, and safety concerns have limited studies in dogs. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the feasibility of swine immunoglobulin G (SwIgG) in healthy dogs as a replacement for hIVIG. ANIMALS: Three healthy female beagles. METHODS: Swine IgG purified by column chromatography and injected SC into beagle dogs with or without intradermal injections at predetermined time points. The dogs were observed for up to 3 weeks with blood collected for clinical chemistry, hematology, and cytokine analysis. Clinical monitoring included heart rate, temperature, and respiratory rate. RESULTS: Injection of 1 dose (1 g/kg) of SwIgG resulted in vomiting after injection that resolved with treatment; no other clinical signs were observed over the 3-week period. One beagle that received a single dose of 0.2 g/kg SwIgG had a reaction and was removed from the second trial. The third beagle received 3 serial doses of 0.5 g/kg SwIgG with no adverse reaction throughout the 3-week period. Clinical chemistry in all dogs indicated slight increase in creatine kinase activity, C-reactive protein concentration, and aspartate aminotransferase activity which returned to normal by day 7 postinjection. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: It is feasible to use SwIgG in dogs and additional studies to investigate its use as an adjunctive treatment for immune-mediated disorders are warranted.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41883212/