Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How to test skin barrier health in dogs with atopic dermatitis
By Cobiella, Danielle et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2019·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Pilot study using five methods to evaluate skin barrier function in healthy dogs and in dogs with atopic dermatitis.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 30 dogs, including 15 healthy dogs and 15 with atopic dermatitis (a skin allergy), were tested to see how well different devices could measure skin health. The study found that the Skin-pH-Meter was the most reliable tool for assessing skin condition, while the VapoMeter showed more variability in results. Dogs with atopic dermatitis had higher skin pH levels and more redness compared to healthy dogs, indicating a compromised skin barrier. These findings suggest that certain tools can effectively evaluate skin health in dogs, which could help in managing skin issues.
People also search for: dog skin allergy treatment · atopic dermatitis in dogs · how to improve dog skin health
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis is associated with skin barrier defects. In people, noninvasive techniques are used to quantify the skin barrier functionality. In dogs, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum hydration and pH have been used to assess skin barrier function. However, few studies have determined their repeatability. OBJECTIVE: To assess the repeatability of measurements of skin hydration, TEWL, pH, skin absorbance and erythema in healthy and atopic dogs. ANIMALS: Fifteen healthy and 15 atopic privately owned dogs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three repeated measurements using Corneometer®, Skin-pH-Meter®, Colorimeter® and VapoMeter® were obtained from inguinal, axilla, pinna and interdigital space by three investigators. Intra- and interobserver variability (coefficient of variation, correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients) and difference between the two groups (t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test) were determined. RESULTS: High repeatability and low variation were observed both intra- and interobservers for all devices except the VapoMeter®. The most repeatable device was the Skin-pH-Meter®, whereas the VapoMeter® was the device with the highest intra- and interobserver variability. Atopic dogs had a significantly increased pH (inguinal P = 0.03; axilla P = 0.02) and erythema (inguinal P = 0.01; axilla P = 0.02) compared to healthy dogs. No differences between the two groups were detected using the Corneometer®, VapoMeter® or Colorimeter® (tartrazine absorption). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this pilot study support the use of Corneometer®, Skin-pH-Meter® and Colorimeter® in the assessment of skin barrier function in dogs; further investigations to optimize measurements and confirm these results are needed.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30644144/