Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Complications from IV catheters in dogs and cats in the UK
By Haskey, E et al.·Published in The Journal of small animal practice·2025·Royal Veterinary College, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Placement, management and complications associated with peripheral intravenous catheter use in UK small animal practice.
Plain-English summary
A total of 382 pets, mostly dogs, had peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) placed to receive fluids or medications while in veterinary care. Unfortunately, about 27% of these catheters experienced complications, with issues like limb swelling and dislodgement being the most common. Factors that increased the risk of problems included multiple attempts to place the catheter and not flushing it regularly. It's important for pet owners to be aware of these potential issues and to monitor their pets closely if they have a PIVC in place.
People also search for: dog IV catheter complications · cat IV fluid therapy issues · pet care after IV placement
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe the techniques for preparation and placement of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs), to describe the complications associated with PIVCs, and to identify factors associated with PIVC complications in small animal practice in the United Kingdom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective multicentre observational study was undertaken between January 2022 and January 2023. Data collected included patient information, information regarding the placement and maintenance of PIVCs, and PIVC complications, from privately owned cats and dogs presenting to veterinary institutes in the United Kingdom. Patients required a PIVC to be placed as part of their care and the PIVC was anticipated to be in situ for >24 hours to be eligible for PIVC complication analysis. RESULTS: A total of 19 institutes recorded data regarding 382 PIVCs, with 325 (85.1%) placed in dogs and 57 (14.9%) in cats. The most common reasons for placement were to administer intravenous fluid therapy (74.3%) and intravenous medications (71.7%). There were 102 of 382 (26.7%) PIVCs associated with a complication, with limb swelling/suspected phlebitis in 44 of 382 (11.5%) and PIVC dislodgement/patient interference in 30 of 382 (7.9%) PIVCs. Factors associated with increased risk of complication were more than 1 attempt to place the PIVC, a second or subsequent PIVC being placed during hospitalisation, flush frequency different than every 1 to 24 hours, and flush solution with compound sodium lactate. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Veterinary professionals must be vigilant when monitoring a patient with a PIVC in situ, particularly if a PIVC is associated with one of the aforementioned factors of increased likelihood of complication.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39238283/