PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Platelet-rich plasma with tissue grafts to heal dog gum recession

By Suaid, Fabricia Ferreira et al.·Published in Journal of periodontology·2008·Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Brazil·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Platelet-rich plasma and connective tissue grafts in the treatment of gingival recessions: a histometric study in dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of six mongrel dogs underwent surgery to treat gum recession, where a connective tissue graft was used to help heal the affected area. Some dogs received an additional treatment of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) along with the graft. After 45 days, the dogs that received PRP showed significantly more new cementum formation compared to those that only had the graft. This suggests that using PRP can enhance the healing process for gum issues in dogs.

People also search for: dog gum recession treatment · platelet-rich plasma for dogs · gingival grafts in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to histometrically evaluate the healing process of gingival recessions treated with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in combination with a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) and to compare it to that obtained with SCTG alone. METHODS: Six mongrel dogs were used in the experiment. Gingival recessions (5 x 7 mm) were surgically created and exposed to plaque accumulation for 1 month. Contralateral defects were randomly assigned to the test group (SCTG + PRP) or the control group (SCTG). Dogs were sacrificed 45 days after the surgeries, and the blocks containing the experimental specimens were processed for histologic analysis. The histometric parameters evaluated were length of sulcular and junctional epithelium, connective tissue adaptation, new cementum, new bone, and defect extension. RESULTS: A greater length of new cementum was observed in the sites treated with PRP (2.18 +/- 0.78 mm) compared to the control group (1.19 +/- 0.62 mm) (P < or =0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed in the remaining parameters. The extension of total epithelium (sulcular and junctional epithelium) was 2.04 +/- 0.57 mm for the test group and 2.49 +/- 0.82 mm for the control group. The new connective tissue adjacent to the root without cementum formation was 0.29 +/- 0.28 mm and 0.23 +/- 0.18 mm for the test and control groups, respectively. Bone position was -0.57 +/- 0.95 mm for the test group and -0.46 +/- 1.34 mm for the control group. CONCLUSION: Within the limits of this study, the combination of PRP with SCTG was more effective in promoting new cementum formation than the graft alone.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18454668/