PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Complications after external bone fixators in cats and where they

By Beever, Lee et al.Ā·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgeryĀ·2017Ā·Queen Mother Hospital for Animals, United KingdomĀ·View original on PubMed →

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Postoperative complications associated with external skeletal fixators in cats.

Species:
cat
Movement & jointsCats

Plain-English summary

A group of 140 cats that had external skeletal fixators (ESFs) placed to help heal fractures were monitored for complications. About 19% of these cats experienced issues, with the most common problems being superficial pin tract infections and implant failures, especially in the femur and tarsus. While complications are not rare, cats generally have fewer pin tract infections compared to dogs. If your cat is recovering from a fracture with an ESF, it's important to keep an eye on the surgical site for any signs of infection or issues with the fixator.

People also search for: cat fracture recovery Ā· external skeletal fixator complications in cats Ā· cat pin tract infection signs

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to quantify complications associated with external skeletal fixators (ESFs) in cats and to identify potential risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records and radiographs following ESF placement was performed. RESULTS: Case records of 140 cats were reviewed; fixator-associated complications (FACs) occurred in 19% of cats. The region of ESF placement was significantly associated with complication development. Complications developed most frequently in the femur (50%), tarsus (35%) and radius/ulna (33%). Superficial pin tract infection (SPTI) and implant failure accounted for 45% and 41% of all FACs, respectively. SPTI occurred more frequently in the femur, humerus and tibia, with implant failure more frequent in the tarsus. No association between breed, age, sex, weight, fracture type (open vs closed), ESF classification, number of pins per bone segment, degree of fracture load sharing, and the incidence or type of FAC was identified. No association between region of placement, breed, age, sex, weight, fracture type (open vs closed), ESF classification, number of pins per bone segment, fracture load sharing and the time to complication development was identified. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Complication development is not uncommon in cats following ESF placement. The higher complication rate in the femur, tarsus and radius/ulna should be considered when reviewing options for fracture management. However, cats appear to have a lower rate of pin tract infections than dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28592224/