Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Ultrasound of femoral vessels before PDA surgery in dogs
By Wesselowski, S et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2022·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Pre-procedural femoral vessel ultrasound in dogs with patent ductus arteriosus: diameter, image quality and relationship with arterial catheterization.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 45 dogs with a heart condition called patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) underwent pre-surgery ultrasound to measure the size of their femoral arteries. The goal was to see which ultrasound method provided better images and measurements for planning a minimally invasive procedure. The results showed that while one method gave clearer images, both methods produced similar size measurements on average. This information helps veterinarians prepare for surgery more effectively, ensuring that the right tools are used for each dog’s unique anatomy.
People also search for: dog patent ductus arteriosus treatment · ultrasound for dog heart condition · femoral artery size in dogs
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Objectives: Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in dogs is often treated via minimally invasive transvascular occlusion using femoral artery access. This study compared ultrasound-derived diameter and image quality of the right femoral artery (RFA) and vein (RFV) in dogs with PDA using a linear ultrasound probe (L-P) and phased-array transthoracic echocardiography probe (TTE-P). The case outcome was assessed. ANIMALS, MATERIALS & METHODS: Forty-five client-owned dogs with PDA were prospectively enrolled. Ultrasound-measured RFA and RFV diameters were obtained on images acquired with both probes pre-operatively and compared using Bland-Altman plots. The image quality of RFA and RFV was scored on L-P and TTE-P images. RESULTS: Comparison of RFA and RFV diameter from L-P versus TTE-P images revealed: [Mean difference (limits of agreement): RFA = 0.009 mm (-0.78-0.79 mm), RFV = 0.523 mm (-1.75-2.79 mm)]. Image quality scores were significantly higher for L-P than TTE-P (P < 0.0001). In six small dogs, measurable images were unattainable with TTE-P. Dogs of similar body weight had variable RFA diameters. Twenty-seven dogs had RFA catheterization. In 21/27 dogs, RFA diameter exceeded the external diameter of the introducer used for catheterization, and in 6/27, it was smaller. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-procedural ultrasound of the RFA in dogs with PDA is useful given variable RFA diameter relative to body weight. Despite poorer image quality, RFA diameters from TTE-P images were very similar to L-P images on average, suggesting TTE-Ps are suitable for pre-procedural planning in most dogs. Vasospasm, hypotension or differences in the location of ultrasound measurement versus catheterization might produce variation in pre-procedural versus intraoperative RFA size.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34996021/