Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Preliminary results of a prospective study of inter- and intra-user variability of the Royal Veterinary College corneal clarity score (RVC-CCS) for use in veterinary practice.
- Journal:
- Veterinary ophthalmology
- Year:
- 2016
- Authors:
- Sanchez, Rick F et al.
- Affiliation:
- The Royal Veterinary College · United Kingdom
Plain-English summary
Researchers have developed a new scoring system to evaluate how clear a dog's or cat's cornea (the clear front part of the eye) is, which can help veterinarians monitor eye health. They tested this system on twelve dogs and two cats with eye problems, as well as five healthy dogs, and found that different veterinarians scored the clarity of the central cornea very consistently. The scoring system ranges from no visibility of the eye's interior to clear details of the eye's features. The results suggest that this new scoring method is reliable and can be used effectively in veterinary practice to track changes in corneal clarity over time. Overall, the study indicates that the new corneal clarity score is a useful tool for veterinarians.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To introduce a new corneal clarity score for use in small animals and describe its inter- and intra-user variability. ANIMALS STUDIED: Twelve dogs and two cats with corneal abnormalities and five dogs with healthy corneas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four examiners scored every patient twice and never consecutively, focusing on the central cornea. The peripheral cornea was scored separately. The following scoring system was used to describe corneal clarity: G0: no fundus reflection is visible on retroillumination (RI) using a head-mounted indirect ophthalmoscope. G1: a fundus reflection is visible with RI. G2: a 0.1-mm diameter light beam is visible on the anterior surface of the iris and/or lens. G3: gross fundic features are visible when viewed with indirect ophthalmoscopy (IO) using a head-mounted indirect ophthalmoscope and a hand-held 30D lens, although fine details are not clear. G4: fine details of the fundic features are clearly visible with IO. The minimum grades given were analyzed for inter- and intra-user variability with kappa analysis. RESULTS: Intra- and interuser variability of the central corneal clarity ranged from 0.78 to 0.96, showing substantial to almost perfect reproducibility, and from 0.66 to 0.91, showing substantial to almost perfect reliability, respectively. Intra- and interuser variability of the peripheral cornea ranged from 0.83 to 0.95, showing almost perfect agreement, and from 0.53 to 0.91, showing moderate to almost perfect agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The RVC-CCS is well suited to assess and monitor central corneal clarity in small animals and to compare outcomes between studies and different surgeons.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26315115/