PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

New rapid blood test for diagnosing brucellosis in dogs

By Wanke, M M et al.·Published in Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene·2012·Faculty of Veterinary Sciences·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Preliminary study of an immunochromatography test for serological diagnosis of canine brucellosis.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs suspected of having brucellosis, a bacterial infection, were tested using a new diagnostic test called FASTest, along with other established tests. The FASTest showed 100% accuracy in healthy dogs and was able to detect the infection in most dogs with acute brucellosis, but it missed some cases of chronic brucellosis. While it performed well as a secondary test after a positive result from a common screening test, it wasn't reliable enough to be used as the first test for diagnosing brucellosis. Overall, the FASTest could be a helpful tool in diagnosing this infection in dogs when used alongside other tests.

People also search for: dog brucellosis symptoms · canine brucellosis test · FASTest test for dogs · dog infection diagnosis

Abstract

The most widely used screening test for the diagnosis of brucellosis in the dog is the rapid slide agglutination test in the presence of 2-mercaptoethanol (2ME-RSAT). The diagnosis is partially confirmed by the agar gel immunodiffusion test (AGID) and definitively confirmed by bacteriological isolation. Some chronic cases not detected by these tests may be detected by ELISA tests. The use of 2ME-RSAT in routine clinical practice requires a microscope and an experienced operator. An immunochromatographic diagnostic test for canine brucellosis (FASTest(®) Brucella c., Megacor, Hörbranz, Austria) has been recently released. In this study, we compared the diagnostic performance of the FASTest with those of 2ME-RSAT, AGID and ELISAs. Sera from 17 healthy dogs used as negative controls yielded negative results by FASTest, indicating a 100% specificity in this sample. Among 27 sera of dogs with acute or subacute brucellosis confirmed by B. canis isolation, all of which were positive by RSAT and ELISAs, the FASTest was positive in 24 cases and AGID in 23. In acute and subacute cases, the sensitivity of FASTest was 89%. Sera from six dogs with bacteriologically confirmed chronic brucellosis, which were positive by ELISAs but negative by 2ME-RSAT, were also tested; 1 was positive by FASTest and 4 were positive by AGID. These preliminary results indicate a good specificity of the FASTest (100% in this sample) but an unacceptable sensitivity as a screening test. In cases with chronic brucellosis, the sensitivity of the FASTest was lower than that of ELISAs but this assay could make a good intermediate test to be run after a positive RSAT and before running an AGID.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23279541/