Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How to predict bladder stone type in dogs before surgery
By To, Iris et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2024·1Schwarzman Animal Medical Center, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Preoperative parameters (signalment, digital radiography, urinalysis, urine microbiological culture) and novel algorithm improve prediction of canine urocystolith composition.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study looked at 175 dogs with bladder stones (urocystoliths) to see how well certain tests could predict what the stones were made of. The tests included a urinalysis, urine culture, and X-rays. The accuracy of predictions varied based on the experience of the veterinarians, but using a new algorithm improved the accuracy significantly, reaching up to 96%. This means that with the right tools, vets can better understand the type of stones in a dog’s bladder, which can help in deciding the best treatment.
People also search for: dog bladder stones treatment · how to tell what type of bladder stones my dog has · dog urinalysis results explained
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of 4 preoperative parameters (signalment, urinalysis, urine microbiological culture, and digital radiography) in predicting urocystolith composition, compare accuracy between evaluators of varying clinical experience and a mobile application, and propose a novel algorithm to improve accuracy. ANIMALS: 175 client-owned dogs with quantitative analyses of urocystoliths between January 1, 2012, and July 31, 2020. METHODS: Prospective experimental study. Canine urocystolith cases were randomly presented to 6 blinded "stone evaluators" (rotating interns, radiologists, internists) in 3 rounds, each separated by 2 weeks: case data alone, case data with a urolith teaching lecture, and case data with a novel algorithm. Case data were also entered into the Minnesota Urolith Center mobile application. Prediction accuracy was determined by comparison to quantitative laboratory stone analysis results. RESULTS: Prediction accuracy of evaluators varied with experience when shown case data alone (accuracy, 57% to 82%) but improved with a teaching lecture (accuracy, 76% to 89%) and further improved with a novel algorithm (accuracy, 93% to 96%). Mixed stone compositions were the most incorrectly predicted type. Mobile application accuracy was 74%. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Use of the 4 preoperative parameters resulted in variable accuracy of urocystolith composition predictions among evaluators. The proposed novel algorithm improves accuracy for all clinicians, surpassing accuracy of the mobile application, and may help guide patient management.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38579782/