PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Deafness rates in dogs with one or two merle genes

By Strain, G M et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2009·Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Prevalence of deafness in dogs heterozygous or homozygous for the merle allele.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study found that deafness is more common in dogs with two copies of the merle gene compared to those with just one copy. Among the 153 merle dogs tested, 10% of those with two copies were unilaterally deaf (hearing in one ear) and 15% were bilaterally deaf (not hearing in either ear). In contrast, only 2.7% of dogs with one copy were unilaterally deaf and 0.9% were bilaterally deaf. This suggests that if you have a merle dog, especially one with two copies of the gene, there is a higher risk of hearing issues.

People also search for: merle dog deafness prevalence · signs of deafness in dogs · how to test dog hearing · merle gene effects on dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Deafness in dogs is frequently associated with the pigment genes piebald and merle. Little is known about the prevalence of deafness in dogs carrying the merle allele. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of deafness in dogs heterozygous and homozygous for the merle allele of the mouse Silver pigment locus homolog (SILV) gene. ANIMALS: One hundred and fifty-three privately owned merle dogs of different breeds and both sexes. METHODS: Hearing was tested by brainstem auditory-evoked response and classified as bilaterally hearing, unilaterally deaf, or bilaterally deaf. DNA from buccal cells was genotyped as either heterozygous or homozygous for the merle allele. Deafness association tests among merle genotype, eye color, and sex were performed by the chi(2) test. RESULTS: Deafness prevalence in merles overall was 4.6% unilaterally deaf and 4.6% bilaterally deaf. There was a significant association between hearing status and heterozygous versus homozygous merle genotype. For single merles (Mm), 2.7% were unilaterally deaf and 0.9% were bilaterally deaf. For double merles (MM), 10% were unilaterally deaf and 15% were bilaterally deaf. There was no significant association with eye color or sex. CONCLUSIONS: Deafness prevalence in merle dogs was greater than that in some dog breeds homozygous for the piebald gene, such as the English Cocker Spaniel, but comparable to, or lower than, that in the Dalmatian and white Bull Terrier. Dogs homozygous for the merle allele were significantly more likely to be deaf than heterozygotes.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19192156/