PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How common is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus in pets and risk

By Igor Loncaric et al.·Published in Antibiotics·2019·Institute of Microbiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria, CH·View original on DOAJ

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus</i> sp. (MRS) in Different Companion Animals and Determination of Risk Factors for Colonization with MRS

Skin & coat

Plain-English summary

A study found that some companion animals, including dogs and cats, can carry methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (MRS) bacteria, which are resistant to common antibiotics. Researchers tested nasal swabs from 347 pets and discovered 23 cases of MRS across various species, including Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. The study highlighted that pets recently hospitalized or treated with antibiotics were at a higher risk of carrying these resistant bacteria. This is important for pet owners to know, as these bacteria can potentially be passed to humans.

People also search for: dog nasal swab results · cat antibiotic resistance · pet infection prevention · methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus in pets · risks of antibiotic use in dogs

Abstract

The aim of this study was to detect the prevalence of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus</i> sp. (MRS) in populations of companion animals that either have previously been exposed or have not been exposed to antibiotic therapy or veterinary facilities, and if owners&#8217; healthcare profession had an influence on colonization with MRS. In addition, the antimicrobial resistance pheno- and genotype were investigated and risks for colonization with MRS were assessed. During this study, 347 nasal swabs (dogs <i>n</i> = 152; cats <i>n</i> = 107; rabbits <i>n</i> = 88) were investigated for the presence of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA). In addition, 131 nasal swabs (dogs <i>n</i> = 79; cats <i>n</i> = 47; rabbits = 3; guinea pigs = 2) were examined for the presence of MRSA but also other MRS. In total, 23 MRS isolates belonged to nine staphylococcal species: <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> (<i>n</i> = 11), <i>Staphylococcus warneri</i> (<i>n</i> = 3), <i>Staphylococcus hominis</i> (<i>n</i> = 2), <i>Staphylococcus pseudintermedius</i> (<i>n</i> = 2), and singletons <i>Staphylococcus cohnii</i>, <i>Staphylococcus sciuri</i>, <i>Staphylococcus fleurettii</i>, <i>Staphylococcus lentus</i>, and <i>Staphylococcus haemolyticus</i>. Twenty isolates displayed a multidrug-resistant phenotype. Various resistance and biocide resistance genes were detected among the examined staphylococci. Risk assessment for MRS colonization was conducted using a number of factors, including animal species, breed, age, gender, recent veterinary health care hospitalization, and antibiotic prescription, resulting in recent veterinary health care hospitalization being a significant risk factor. The detection of multidrug-resistant MRS in healthy animals is of importance due to their zoonotic potential.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on DOAJ: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8020036