PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How often dogs have positive urine cultures with inactive urine

By Strachan, Nicole A et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2022·Veterinary Specialty Hospital of San Diego, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Prevalence of positive urine culture in the presence of inactive urine sediment in 1049 urine samples from dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study looked at urine samples from dogs that had inactive sediment to see how often they had bacterial infections. Out of 1,049 samples, only 3.4% tested positive for bacteria, with E. coli being the most common type found. The results suggest that if a dog's urine shows no active sediment, it might not be necessary to do further testing for infections, as the chances are low. This can help pet owners and vets decide when to test for urinary tract issues based on symptoms rather than routine checks.

People also search for: dog urine infection symptoms · why is my dog peeing frequently · dog urinalysis results explained

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urinalysis (UA) is often used to screen for bacterial cystitis, regardless of sediment results, and followed up by quantitative urine culture (UC) for definitive diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: Determine prevalence of positive UCs in dogs with inactive urine sediments on routine UA. ANIMALS: A total of 1049 urine samples with inactive urine sediments and UCs collected from dogs presented to a veterinary specialty hospital between January 2018 and February 2020. METHODS: Retrospective study of dogs with an inactive urine sediment on routine UA and follow-up UCs. Signalment, UA findings, proteinuria, and UC results were recorded. Associations among these findings were assessed using multivariate logistic regression carried out using a backward stepwise method. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of positive UC was 3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-4.8). Escherichia coli was the most commonly isolated bacteria. Only naturally voided samples were associated with increased prevalence of positive culture when compared to collection by cystocentesis or a non-specified method. No statistically significant association with culture positivity was found for urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, urine specific gravity, urine pH, breed, age, or sex. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Based on the low prevalence (3.4%) of positive culture in urine samples from dogs with inactive sediment on routine UA and the relatively high cost of UC and sensitivity, cost-benefit analysis including clinical suspicion of lower urinary tract disease should inform testing decisions, rather than routinely performing cultures on urine samples without active sediments.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35108434/