Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Surgery to remove preputial mast cell tumors in dogs without penis
By Hammerton, R et al.·Published in New Zealand veterinary journal·2024·Soft Tissue Surgery Department, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Primary preputial reconstruction following surgical excision of cutaneous mast cell tumours without penile amputation in eight dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
An 8-year-old male dog with a cutaneous mast cell tumor on the prepuce underwent surgery to remove the tumor while preserving the penis. The owners chose not to pursue more invasive options like penile amputation. After the tumor was excised, the prepuce was reconstructed, and the surgery was successful with no local recurrence of the tumor. Most dogs recovered well, although a few had minor complications. The dogs were followed for over two years, and none died from the mast cell disease during that time.
People also search for: dog preputial tumor treatment · mast cell tumor surgery in dogs · dog skin tumor reconstruction
Abstract
CASE HISTORY: Medical records from a single referral hospital (Davies Veterinary Specialists, Hitchin, UK) were reviewed to identify dogs (n = 8) with preputial cutaneous mast cell tumours (CMCT) that underwent surgical excision and primary preputial reconstruction, preserving the penis and urethra, after clients declined alternatives such as penile amputation and urethrostomy, from June 2017-June 2022. CLINICAL FINDINGS: Tumours had a median diameter of 21.5 (min 15, max 30) mm, were located cranioventrally (3/8), caudoventrally (1/8), laterally (2/8) and dorsally (2/8) relative to the prepuce and were diagnosed as CMCT based on cytology. No dogs had hepatic or splenic metastasis on cytology but inguinal lymph node metastasis was identified in 3/4 dogs sampled. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME: The owners of all dogs had declined penile amputation and scrotal urethrostomy. The CMCT were excised and primary reconstruction of the prepuce performed. Surgical lateral margins of 10, 20 or 30 mm were used and the deep margin excised the inner preputial lamina or underlying muscular fascia. The deep margin for caudoventral CMCT involved excision of the underlying SC adipose tissue. Preputial advancement was performed in 3/8 dogs to achieve adequate penile coverage. Histopathology confirmed all CMCT were Kiupel low grade, Patnaik grade II with complete margins in 6/8 dogs but identified metastasis only in one inguinal lymph node from one dog. Two dogs encountered minor complications (infection and a minor dehiscence) and one dog had a major complication (infection with major dehiscence). Median follow-up duration was 125 weeks, excluding one dog with 4 weeks of follow-up. None of the dogs experienced local recurrence or died of mast cell disease during the available follow-up period. CLINICAL RELEVANCE:  This clinical study evaluated a surgical alternative to penile amputation and advanced reconstructive techniques for Kuipel low/Patnaik grade II preputial CMCT when these procedures were declined by owners. Surgical excision of preputial CMCT with lateral margins of 10, 20 or 30 mm with primary preputial reconstruction is achievable with low morbidity and a good outcome when penile amputation and scrotal urethrostomy is not an option.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38324991/