Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Limited protection from combined DNA and virus vaccines against
By Dunham, Stephen P et al.·Published in Vaccine·2006·Institute of Comparative Medicine, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Prime-boost vaccination using DNA and whole inactivated virus vaccines provides limited protection against virulent feline immunodeficiency virus.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of cats was tested for protection against feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) using different vaccines, including a combination of DNA and whole inactivated virus (WIV) vaccines. After being vaccinated, two cats remained free of the virus after exposure, while all unvaccinated cats became infected. However, those vaccinated with either WIV or DNA alone showed lower levels of the virus in their blood compared to the unvaccinated group. The combination vaccine did not provide any significant extra benefit over the individual vaccines. Overall, while the vaccines offered some protection, it was limited against more severe strains of the virus.
People also search for: cat FIV vaccine effectiveness · feline immunodeficiency virus treatment · cat vaccination for FIV
Abstract
Protection against feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) has been achieved using a variety of vaccines notably whole inactivated virus (WIV) and DNA. However protection against more virulent isolates, typical of those encountered in natural infections, has been difficult to achieve. In an attempt to improve protection against virulent FIV(GL8), we combined both DNA and WIV vaccines in a "prime-boost" approach. Thirty cats were divided into four groups receiving vaccinations and one unvaccinated control group. Following viral challenge, two vaccinated animals, one receiving DNA alone and one the prime-boost vaccine remained free of viraemia, whilst all controls became viraemic. Animals vaccinated with WIV showed apparent early enhancement of infection at 2 weeks post challenge (pc) with higher plasma viral RNA loads than control animals or cats immunised with DNA alone. Despite this, animals vaccinated with WIV or DNA alone showed significantly lower proviral loads in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and mesenteric lymph node cells, whilst those receiving the DNA-WIV prime-boost vaccine showed significantly lower proviral loads in PBMC, than control animals, at 35 weeks pc. Therefore both DNA and WIV vaccines conferred limited protection against viral challenge but the combination of WIV and DNA in a prime-boost approach appeared to offer no significant advantage over either vaccine alone.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17049683/