Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Private and public economic incentives for the control of animal diseases: the case of anthrax in livestock.
- Journal:
- Transboundary and emerging diseases
- Year:
- 2008
- Authors:
- Ndiva Mongoh, M et al.
- Affiliation:
- School of Natural Resources · United States
Plain-English summary
This study looked at how both public and private organizations can work together to control anthrax, a serious disease that affects livestock, particularly during outbreaks like the one in North Dakota in 2005. Anthrax can cause significant economic losses for farmers, so it's important for both sectors to collaborate effectively. The research suggests that government programs are necessary to help manage the disease, as they can create incentives for farmers to participate in prevention efforts. These programs should encourage farmers to take part without making them feel overwhelmed or discouraged. Overall, the study emphasizes the importance of teamwork among farmers, veterinarians, and government agencies to successfully manage anthrax outbreaks and protect both livestock and public health.
Abstract
This study examined the roles of the public and private sectors as economic components of anthrax control with direct reference to the 2005 anthrax outbreak in livestock in North Dakota. Anthrax is an endemic disease in North Dakota, which often causes disease outbreaks in livestock, leading to economic losses to the livestock industry. The economic incentives and interests behind public and private control of an anthrax outbreak are investigated. Anthrax management is most effective with the participation of public and private firms. As anthrax is an infectious disease, its control also brings positive economic externalities, which are not accounted for in a producer's decision to protect animals. Therefore, public programs designed to control the disease must be implemented. The government can change producer response to anthrax by setting up policies and incentives that encourage their participation. However, these interventions must encourage compliance and not discourage producers from actively taking part in anthrax management. Producers have economy-based interests and personal reasons for controlling anthrax in their farms. The main reason behind government intervention is to provide assurance to the public who consume livestock products. Another reason is to assist producers and veterinarians, and to achieve biosecurity and biosafety objectives. The contribution of each animal healthcare partner in making anthrax management a success in North Dakota is discussed.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18786071/