Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Factors that affect vision recovery in dogs with optic neuritis
By Posporis, Christoforos et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2019·Neurology/Neurosurgery Service, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Prognostic Factors for Recovery of Vision in Canine Optic Neuritis of Unknown Etiology: 26 Dogs (2003-2018).
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 26 dogs diagnosed with optic neuritis (a condition affecting the optic nerve) were studied to understand what factors might help them recover their vision. Symptoms included vision loss, and the dogs were evaluated based on their age, eye reflexes, and other medical tests. Out of the group, 6 dogs (about 23%) fully regained their vision, while the rest did not. Factors that seemed to help recovery included being younger, having a normal pupillary light reflex, and showing fewer signs of inflammation in their cerebrospinal fluid.
People also search for: dog vision loss treatment · canine optic neuritis recovery · why is my dog blind · dog eye problems · optic nerve issues in dogs
Abstract
Optic neuritis (ON) is a recognized condition, yet factors influencing recovery of vision are currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify prognostic factors for recovery of vision in canine ON of unknown etiology. Clinical databases of three referral hospitals were searched for dogs with presumptive ON based on clinicopathologic, MRI/CT, and fundoscopic findings. Twenty-six dogs diagnosed with presumptive ON of unknown etiology, isolated (I-ON) and MUE-associated (MUE-ON), were included in the study. Their medical records were reviewed retrospectively, and the association of complete recovery of vision with signalment, clinicopathologic findings, and treatment was investigated. Datasets were tested for normality using the D'Agostino and Shapiro-Wilk tests. Individual datasets were compared using the Chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, and the Mann-Whitney U-test. For multiple comparisons with parametric datasets, the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, and for non-parametric datasets, the Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to test for independence. For all data, averages are expressed as median with interquartile range and significance set at< 0.05. Twenty-six dogs met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 230 days (range 21-1901 days, mean 496 days). Six dogs (23%) achieved complete recovery and 20 dogs (77%) incomplete or no recovery of vision. The presence of a reactive pupillary light reflex (= 0.013), the absence of fundoscopic lesions (= 0.0006), a younger age (= 0.038), and a lower cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) total nucleated cell count (TNCC) (= 0.022) were statistically associated with complete recovery of vision. Dogs with I-ON were significantly younger (= 0.046) and had lower CSF TNCC (= 0.030) compared to the MUE-ON group. This study identified prognostic factors that may influence complete recovery of vision in dogs with ON. A larger cohort of dogs is required to determine whether these findings are robust and whether additional parameters aid accurate prognosis for recovery of vision in canine ON.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31824972/