Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How ATT and mGCS Scores Predict Survival in Dogs and Cats After Trauma
By Neimann A et al.·2025·Clinic of Small Animals·View original on Europe PMC →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Prognostic Performance of ATT and mGCS Scores in Dogs and Cats with Traumatic Injury.
Plain-English summary
A group of 30 pets, including 20 dogs and 10 cats, were admitted to veterinary hospitals after suffering traumatic injuries. The study looked at how well two scoring systems, the Animal Trauma Triage (ATT) score and the modified Glasgow Coma Scale (mGCS), could predict survival and organ failure. Most pets survived, but those that didn't had higher respiratory rates when they arrived. The ATT score was effective in predicting which pets would not survive, while the mGCS score was less helpful. This research suggests that using the ATT score can help veterinarians make better decisions in emergency situations.
People also search for: dog trauma survival rate · cat injury prognosis · veterinary trauma assessment tools
Abstract
Trauma is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in dogs and cats. While prognostic tools are well-established in human medicine, few guidelines exist in veterinary trauma care. The Animal Trauma Triage (ATT) score and modified Glasgow Coma Scale (mGCS) are used to assess illness severity, but their clinical utility in veterinary patients remains undervalued. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of ATT and mGCS scores and their association with organ dysfunction and survival in polytraumatized veterinary patients. We hypothesized that multi-organ failure (MOF) is more prevalent in non-survivors and correlates with higher ATT and lower mGCS scores. A prospective observational study was conducted for 30 patients (20 dogs and 10 cats) admitted to two veterinary hospitals. Clinical data, trauma scores, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. The overall survival rate was 83.3%; blunt trauma accounted for 80% of cases. Non-survivors (<i>n</i> = 5) had higher respiratory rates at admission (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The ATT score accurately predicted all fatalities, while the mGCS score showed limited prognostic value. MOF was the leading cause of death in 60% of non-survivors. ATT appears to be a more reliable tool for outcome prediction, enabling improved triage, resource allocation, and early intervention in veterinary trauma cases.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Europe PMC: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/41295719