PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Radiation outcomes for dog nasal tumors by tumor type and CT stage

By Adams, William M et al.·Published in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association·2009·Department of Surgical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Prognostic significance of tumor histology and computed tomographic staging for radiation treatment response of canine nasal tumors.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 94 dogs with nasal tumors underwent radiation treatment, and researchers looked at how tumor type and CT scan results affected their chances of survival. Dogs with certain aggressive tumor types, like anaplastic and squamous cell carcinomas, had shorter survival times compared to those with sarcomas. The study found that dogs with less severe CT findings, such as no bone damage, lived longer, while those with more severe findings had shorter survival. Combining CT scan results with tumor type provided better predictions for how long dogs might live after treatment.

People also search for: dog nasal tumor treatment · canine radiation therapy prognosis · dog tumor types survival rates

Abstract

Prognostic significance of tumor histology and four computed tomography (CT) staging methods was tested retrospectively in dogs from three treatment centers that underwent intent-to-cure-radiotherapy for intranasal neoplasia. Disease-free and overall survival times were available for 94 dogs. A grouping of anaplastic, squamous cell, and undifferentiated carcinomas had a significantly shorter median disease-free survival (4.4 mo) than a grouping of all sarcomas (10.6 months). Disease-free survivals were not significantly different, when all carcinomas were compared with all sarcomas. The published original and modified WHO staging methods did not significantly relate to either survival endpoint. A modified human maxillary tumor staging system previously applied to canine nasal tumors was prognostically significant for both survival endpoints; a further modified version of that CT-based staging system resulted in improved significance for both survival endpoints. Dogs with unilateral intranasal involvement without bone destruction beyond the turbinates on CT, had longest median survival (23.4 months); CT evidence of cribriform plate involvement was associated with shortest median survival (6.7 months). Combining CT and histology statistically improved prognostic significance for both survival endpoints over the proposed CT staging method alone. Significance was lost when CT stages were collapsed to < four categories or histopathology groupings were collapsed to < three categories.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19507402/