Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Rapid in-clinic tests for diagnosing acute leptospirosis in dogs
By Troìa, R et al.·Published in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2018·Department of Veterinary Medical Science, Italy·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Prospective evaluation of rapid point-of-care tests for the diagnosis of acute leptospirosis in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs showing signs of acute kidney injury and other serious symptoms were tested for leptospirosis, a bacterial infection. Researchers evaluated two quick in-clinic tests that check for antibodies against the bacteria. The tests were found to be helpful for initial screening, as positive results strongly suggested leptospirosis, while negative results meant further testing was needed. Although these rapid tests are useful, confirmatory tests are still necessary to accurately diagnose the infection.
People also search for: dog kidney injury symptoms · leptospirosis test for dogs · rapid test for dog infections
Abstract
The early diagnosis of acute leptospirosis is still a major challenge in dogs. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the suitability of two in-clinic tests detecting anti-leptospiral IgM and IgG antibodies in diagnosing canine leptospirosis. The performances of the two rapid tests were compared to the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) carried out on acute sera and to diagnostic criteria adopted in this study to confirm leptospirosis infection (MAT upon admission, convalescent MAT and quantitative real-time PCR on blood and/or urine). The dogs were enrolled on the basis of reported exposure to known risk factors and clinical presentation (acute kidney injury and/or systemic inflammatory response syndrome with multi-organ damage). Eighty-nine dogs included in the study were sub-grouped on the basis of the results of the diagnostic criteria adopted: (1) confirmed leptospirosis cases (42/89 dogs); (2) negative leptospirosis cases (36/89 dogs); and (3) unconfirmed leptospirosis cases (11/89 dogs). The results supported the usefulness of the two rapid diagnostic tests as a first in-clinic screening tool for suspected leptospirosis; positive results in the in-clinic tests in dogs with suggestive clinical and laboratory signs strongly indicated acute leptospirosis, while negative results required additional diagnostic investigation to exclude the infection. Confirmatory tests recommended for canine leptospirosis are still necessary in addition to the use of rapid in-clinic tests.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30089543/