Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Surgery outcomes for sliding hiatal hernia and reflux in dogs
By Mayhew, Philipp D et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2017·Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Prospective evaluation of surgical management of sliding hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 17 dogs with sliding hiatal hernia (a condition where part of the stomach pushes into the chest) and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) were evaluated to see how well surgery would help their symptoms. Many of these dogs had issues with regurgitation and some even developed aspiration pneumonia. After surgery, 8 out of 10 dogs showed improvement in their regurgitation, and overall, the severity of the hernia decreased. However, some dogs still experienced GER and hernia issues after the surgery, indicating that while surgery can help, it doesn't always completely resolve the problem.
People also search for: dog regurgitation treatment · sliding hiatal hernia surgery dogs · gastroesophageal reflux in dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate response to surgical management of sliding hiatal hernia (SHH) and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in dogs using standardized clinical scoring, videofluoroscopic swallow studies, and impedance planimetry. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial. ANIMALS: A total of 17 client-owned dogs. METHODS: Dogs were included if they had clinical signs and videofluoroscopic evidence of SHH and/or GER. Owners were asked to complete a standardized canine dysphagia assessment tool (CDAT) preoperatively and postoperatively. Conscious videofluoroscopic swallowing studies and impedance planimetry (IP) were used to evaluate esophageal function and lower esophageal sphincter location and geometry preoperatively and in a subsection of dogs postoperatively. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 13/17 dogs included in the study had a history of regurgitation, and 4/17 had radiographic evidence of aspiration pneumonia. Postprandial regurgitation improved in 8/10 dogs with preoperative regurgitation, and for which completed preoperative and postoperative CDAT questionnaires were available (P < .01). The hiatal hernia severity score improved postoperatively (P = .046) in dogs with preoperative and postoperative videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (n = 12). However, hernia frequency score (P = .2) and IP parameters did not differ significantly between time points. CONCLUSION: Clinical signs of SHH generally improved with surgery but did not consistently resolve. Videofluoroscopic studies provide evidence that GER and SHH can persist postoperatively in some patients. Based on IP findings, clinical improvement may be attributed to a mechanism independent of lower esophageal sphincter attenuation.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29090865/