Prospective, international analysis of quality of life outcomes in recurrent versus primary ventral hernia repairs.

Abstract

<h4>Background</h4>Quality of life (QOL) has become a key outcome measure following ventral hernia repair (VHR), but recurrent and primary VHR have not been compared in this context previously.<h4>Methods</h4>The International Hernia Mesh Registry (2008-2019) was used to identify patients with QOL data scored by the Carolinas Comfort Scale preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 year.<h4>Results</h4>Repairs were performed in 227 recurrent and 1,122 primary VHs. Recurrent patients had a higher BMI, larger defects, and were more likely to have preoperative pain, but other comorbidities were equal. Recurrence rates at 1 year were equivalent. Recurrent patients had a greater improvement in pain (-6.3 ± 10.2 vs -4.3 ± 8.3,p = 0.002) and movement limitation (-5.5 ± 10.0 vs -3.2 ± 7.2,p < 0.001) compared to primary patients, but they had increased postoperative mesh sensation (4.6 ± 7.7 vs 2.7 ± 5.5,p < 0.001).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Recurrent VHRs led to improved pain and movement limitation, but increased mesh sensation. These findings may be useful for preoperative counseling in the elective setting.