PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Platelet-rich plasma may protect dog joint cells from lidocaine damage

By Erika Bianchini et al.·Published in Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica·2018·Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, GB·View original on DOAJ

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Protective effects of platelet-rich plasma against lidocaine cytotoxicity on canine articular chondrocytes

Species:
dog
Movement & jointsDogs

Plain-English summary

A study found that lidocaine, a common local anesthetic used in dog surgeries, can harm joint cells called chondrocytes. When researchers tested platelet-rich plasma (PRP), they discovered that it could protect these cells from damage caused by lidocaine. Specifically, when chondrocytes were treated with PRP before or alongside lidocaine, they showed improved survival rates and less cell death. This suggests that PRP might be a helpful treatment to use with lidocaine injections in dogs, but more studies are needed to confirm its safety and effectiveness in real-life situations.

People also search for: dog surgery lidocaine side effects · platelet-rich plasma for dogs · how to protect dog joints during surgery

Abstract

Abstract Background Lidocaine (LD) is one of the most commonly used local anesthetics for performing arthroscopic surgery and managing of osteoarthritic pain in both human and veterinary medicine. However, over the last years, several studies have focused on the chondrotoxic effects of LD. In order to ensure that intra-articular lidocaine is safe to use, treatments aimed at mitigating chondrocyte death have recently been investigated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the possible protective effects of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) against LD cytotoxicity on canine articular chondrocytes. Results Articular canine chondrocytes, were exposed to 1% or 1.8% LD alone or in co-presence with 10% PRP for 30 min. In order to evaluate the effects of PRP pre-treatments, experiments were carried out on cells cultured in serum-free medium-or in medium supplemented with 10% PRP or 10% fetal bovine serum. Cell viability was evaluated by methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium assay and cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry using annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate/propidium iodide. The results showed that LD significantly reduced canine chondrocytes viability, probably due to apoptosis induction. Pre-treatment or the co-presence of PRP in the media restored the number of viable chondrocytes. The PRP also seemed to protect the cells from LD-induced apoptosis. Conclusions Pre-treatments and/or the simultaneous administration of PRP reduced LD-induced cytotoxicity in canine chondrocytes. Further in vivo studies are required to determine whether PRP can be used as a save protective treatment for dogs receiving intra-articular LD injections.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on DOAJ: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-018-0418-0