Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Pyruvate oral rehydration salt helps dogs survive severe burns
By Liu, Rui et al.·Published in Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries·2016·Department of Burns, China·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Pyruvate in oral rehydration salt improves hemodynamics, vasopermeability and survival after burns in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 40 dogs with severe burns was treated with either a special oral rehydration solution containing pyruvate or another solution with citrate to see which helped them recover better. The dogs given the pyruvate solution showed improved blood flow and organ function, and they had a higher survival rate compared to those receiving the citrate solution. Specifically, 50% of the dogs treated with the pyruvate solution survived, while only 20% of those on the citrate solution did. This suggests that the pyruvate-enriched solution is more effective for dogs recovering from severe burns.
People also search for: dog burn treatment · oral rehydration for dogs · pyruvate benefits for dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate whether pyruvate-enriched oral rehydration solution (Pyr-ORS), compared with citrate-enriched ORS (Cit-ORS), improves hemodynamics and organ function by alleviating vasopermeability and plasma volume loss during intra-gastric fluid rehydration in dogs with severe burn. METHODS: Forty dogs subjected to severe burn were randomly divided into four groups (n=10): two oral rehydrated groups with Pyr-ORS and Cit-ORS (group PR and group CR), respectively, according to the Parkland formula during the first 24h after burns. Other two groups were the intravenous (IV) resuscitation (group VR) with lactated Ringer's solution with the same dosage and no fluid rehydration (group NR). During the next 24h, all groups received the same IV infusion. The hemodynamics, plasma volume, vasopermeability and water contents and function of various organs were determined. Plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet activating factor (PAF) were detected by ELISA. RESULTS: Hemodynamics parameters were significantly improved in group PR superior to group CR after burns. Levels of VEGF and PAF were significantly lower in group PR than in group CR. Organ function parameters were also greatly preserved in group PR, relative to groups CR and NR. Lactic acidosis was fully corrected and survival increased in group PR (50.0%), compared to group CR (20.0%). CONCLUSION: Pyr-ORS was more effective than Cit-ORS in improving hemodynamics, visceral blood perfusion and organ function by alleviating vasopermeability-induced visceral edema and plasma volume loss in dogs with severe burn.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27130433/