Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Quality management recommendations for automated and manual in-house hematology of domestic animals.
- Journal:
- The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice
- Year:
- 2012
- Authors:
- Flatland, Bente & Vap, Linda M
- Affiliation:
- Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences · United States
Plain-English summary
This research discusses the importance of quality management in blood testing for pets, whether done with automated machines or by hand. It emphasizes that only trained staff should handle blood samples and perform tests to ensure accuracy and safety. Regular checks and reviews of blood tests are necessary to catch any mistakes, and practices should decide how often to do these checks based on their specific situation. The study encourages veterinary clinics to keep learning about quality management to improve their testing processes. Overall, the findings highlight that maintaining high standards in blood testing is crucial for reliable results.
Abstract
In-house hematology testing has distinct advantages and requires an ongoing commitment to quality assurance. Hematology POCA should always be operated by qualified personnel who have received adequate instrument operational, safety, and biohazard training. Likewise, blood samples should be acquired and handled, and blood smears made, by adequately trained personnel. Nonstatistical QA procedures are vital to minimize all types of laboratory error (preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical) and include many common sense procedures already performed in well-maintained veterinary practices. Blood smear review is a critical component of QA in hematology testing. Each veterinary practice using POCA must determine frequency of QC (ie, frequency of “running controls”) based on factors such as POCA analyzer type, clinic operating budget, and caseload; at least daily QC is encouraged if possible. QC should be performed frequently enough that QCM are used cost-effectively and that POCA analytical error can be reliably detected. Unacceptable QC data (however defined) should prompt investigation of the POCA, reagents, and operator. Veterinarians and veterinary technicians are encouraged to pursue continuing education about laboratory quality management and to utilize relevant guidelines, such as those available from the ASVCP.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22285154/