Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How an immunotherapy affected anti-Pythium antibodies in healthy dogs
By Arsuaga-Zorrilla, Carmen B et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2018·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Quantitation of anti-Pythium insidiosum antibodies before and after administration of an immunotherapeutic product to healthy dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
Seven healthy hound-crossbred dogs were given an immunotherapy treatment to see if it would affect their levels of antibodies against Pythium insidiosum, a type of fungus that can cause serious infections. The dogs had their antibody levels checked before treatment and at various points afterward. The results showed that the treatment did not significantly change the antibody levels, which remained within the normal range for healthy dogs. This suggests that the immunotherapy may not interfere with future testing for infections, but more research is needed to see how it works in dogs that are actually infected.
People also search for: dog Pythium insidiosum treatment · immunotherapy for dogs · healthy dog antibody levels
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of an immunotherapeutic product on concentrations of anti-Pythium insidiosum antibodies in dogs. ANIMALS 7 healthy hound-crossbreds. PROCEDURES Antibody concentrations were evaluated before (day 0) and after administration of the immunotherapeutic product. The immunotherapeutic product was administered on days 0, 7, and 21. Serum was obtained on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, and 56. Anti-P insidiosum antibody concentrations were measured and reported as the percentage positivity relative to results for a strongly positive control serum. RESULTS Mean ± SD percentage positivity before administration of the immunotherapeutic product was 7.45 ± 3.02%. There was no significant change in anti-P insidiosum antibody concentrations after administration of the product, with percentage positivity values in all dogs remaining within the range expected for healthy dogs (3% to 15%). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Administration of the immunotherapeutic product to healthy dogs in accordance with the manufacturer's suggested protocol did not induce a significant change in anti-P insidiosum antibody concentrations. These results suggested that administration of the immunotherapeutic product may not interfere with postadministration serologic monitoring. However, further investigations will be required to determine whether there is a similar effect in naturally infected dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30372150/