PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Does using an infusion pump cause blood cell damage in cats?

By Blasi-Brugué, Carles et al.·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgery·2021·Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Spain·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Quantitative assessment of infusion pump-mediated haemolysis in feline packed red blood cell transfusions.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

This study looked at how using certain types of infusion pumps affects the breakdown of red blood cells in cats during blood transfusions. Researchers tested packed red blood cells from cats that had been stored for about 35 to 42 days. They compared the amount of red blood cell breakdown when the blood was delivered by gravity versus two different infusion pumps. The results showed that the level of breakdown was very similar across all methods, indicating that using these pumps does not significantly increase the risk of red blood cell damage during transfusions. Overall, the treatment methods tested did not lead to a noticeable difference in red blood cell health.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Haemolysis caused by the use of peristaltic infusion pumps (PIPs) has been described in human and canine packed red blood cells (pRBCs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of two different linear PIPs on the haemolysis of feline pRBC units stored for a long time. METHODS: Feline pRBC units stored with adenine, dextrose, mannitol and sodium chloride (SAGM) were manufactured. After 35-42 days of storage at 2-4°C, a line administration system with a 180 µm filter was attached to every pRBC bag, the system was drained by gravity alone (8 drops/min) and a 1.3 ml sample was collected (G). A NIKI V4 pump was then used at a flow rate of 25 ml/h, the flow was stopped when the infusion system was filled with blood coming from the infusion pump and another 1.3 ml sample was collected (NK). Finally, an Infusomat FmS pump was evaluated, collecting another 1.3 ml sample (IM). Packed cell volume (PCV) was measured in all samples by microhaematocrit centrifugation, total haemoglobin (HGB) was measured using a specific haemoglobin analyser and, after centrifugation, free HGB was determined by spectrophotometry. The percentage of haemolysis was calculated. Friedman's test was used to compare the samples. RESULTS: Fifteen feline pRBC units were evaluated. The average degree of haemolysis for sample G (gravity-assisted) was 1.12%. Comparison of the degree of gravity-assisted haemolysis with haemolysis in PIP NK (1.13%) and IM (1.14%) samples revealed no significant differences, with differences of only 0.01% and 0.02%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this study demonstrate that the use of two common PIPs in veterinary hospitals does not produce levels of haemolysis that are significantly different than that caused by gravity alone during transfusion of feline pRBCs at a rate of 25 ml/h.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33719675/