PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Diagnosing elbow joint mismatch in young large dogs with medial

By Griffon, Dominique J et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2018·College of Veterinary Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Radiographic, computed tomographic, and arthroscopic diagnosis of radioulnar incongruence in dogs with medial coronoid disease.

Species:
dog
Movement & jointsDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of 24 large-breed dogs under 3 years old with medial coronoid disease (a type of elbow joint problem) were examined to see how well different imaging techniques could diagnose radioulnar incongruence (RUI), which is a misalignment in the elbow joint. The study found that RUI was detected in varying degrees by X-rays, CT scans, and arthroscopy (a procedure to look inside the joint), with arthroscopy being the most reliable method. Dogs with RUI showed signs of joint damage, and while CT scans and arthroscopy identified similar issues, they did not always agree on the severity or location of the RUI. This means that while CT can help, it may not always provide a clear picture for treatment decisions.

People also search for: dog elbow pain treatment · medial coronoid disease in dogs · radioulnar incongruence diagnosis in dogs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize radioulnar incongruence (RUI) in large dogs with medial coronoid disease (MCD) and determine the agreement between radiography, computed tomography (CT), and arthroscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational case series. ANIMALS: Twenty-four large-breed dogs under 3 years of age with confirmed MCD. METHODS: MCD and incongruence were evaluated by radiographs and CT. RUI was measured along the ulnar commissure, mid-body, and apex of the medial coronoid process (MCP) by CT and arthroscopy. Joints with RUI ≥ 2 mm were considered incongruent. Variables recorded during arthroscopic treatment included type of MCD, RUI, and modified Outerbridge score. Agreement between the 3 diagnostic imaging techniques was evaluated, and the association between RUI and cartilage damage was analyzed. RESULTS: Single fragmentation was the most common MCD according to CT and arthroscopy. RUI was associated with degenerative joint disease according to CT and with cartilage damage according to arthroscopy. RUI was diagnosed in 26% of elbows by radiography, in 35% of elbows by CT, in 78% of elbows according to CT measurements of RUI ≥ 2 mm, and in 57% of joints by arthroscopy. RUI was most commonly detected at the ulnar commissure with CT and at the apex of the MCP with arthroscopy. Imaging modalities were in poor to fair agreement with arthroscopy when evaluating RUI. CONCLUSION: CT and arthroscopy provided similar detection of MCD and cartilage disease but disagreed in the assessment and localization of RUI. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: CT does not reliably predict arthroscopic assessment of RUI and associated treatment decisions for MCD.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29536555/