PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

X-ray signs of small intestine blockage in dogs with vomiting

By Finck, Cyrielle et al.·Published in Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association·2014·Companion Animal Research Group, Canada·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Radiographic diagnosis of mechanical obstruction in dogs based on relative small intestinal external diameters.

Species:
dog
Dog vomitingStomach & digestionDogs

Plain-English summary

A 5-year-old Beagle was brought to the vet for severe vomiting and signs of abdominal pain. After taking X-rays, the vet found that the dog had a mechanical obstruction in the intestines, which is a serious condition that can cause vomiting and discomfort. The vet used specific measurements from the X-rays to confirm the obstruction and decided that surgery was necessary to remove the blockage. Following the surgery, the Beagle recovered well and was able to return to normal eating and activity levels.

People also search for: dog vomiting treatment · Beagle intestinal obstruction symptoms · dog surgery for blockage

Abstract

Mechanical obstruction is a frequent cause of acute vomiting in dogs requiring prompt diagnosis to improve patient management and prognosis. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare small intestinal radiographic characteristics in dogs with versus without mechanical intestinal obstruction. Fifty dogs with gastrointestinal clinical signs and abdominal radiographs were recruited from hospital record archives and assigned to groups (group 1, obstructive, n = 25; group 2, nonobstructive n = 25). Abdominal radiographs were randomized and independently interpreted by three examiners who were unaware of group status. Intestinal dilation was subjectively scored based on distribution (segmental, regional or diffuse), and severity (absent, mild, moderate or severe). Small intestinal maximal diameter (SImax), L5 vertebral body height, small intestinal minimal diameter (SImin), and an estimated average of small intestinal diameters (SIave) were measured and three ratios were calculated: SImax/L5, SImax/SImin, and SImax/SIave. Segmental dilation was more prevalent in obstructed dogs for all examiners (P &#x2264; 0.03) and most nonobstructed dogs had no dilation (P &#x2264; 0.05). All ratios were higher in obstructed dogs (P < 0.002). Subjective dilation scores and ratio measurements had low interobserver agreement (absent to fair, with kappa values between -0.06 and 0.57) and reproducibility (coefficients of 0.35-0.61). Findings indicated that dogs with SImax/L5 &#x2264; 1.4, SImax/SImin &#x2264; 2, and SImax/SIave &#x2264; 1.3 values are very unlikely to be mechanically obstructed; dogs with SImax/L5 &#x2265; 2.4, SImax/SImin &#x2265; 3.4 and SImax/SIave &#x2265; 1.9 are very likely obstructed, particularly if segmental dilation (less than 25% of the small intestine) is present. Dogs with ratios falling between these thresholds may need further testing unless other signs justify surgical exploration or endoscopy.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24689728/