Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
X-ray signs linked to lameness after Zurich hip replacement in dogs
By Hanson, Steven P et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2006·Affiliated Veterinary Specialists PA and Central Florida Veterinary Radiology PA, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Radiographic evaluation of the Zurich cementless total hip acetabular component.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs that had hip replacement surgery using a specific implant were checked for signs of pain and lameness. Out of 68 implants evaluated, about 12% of the dogs showed lameness, which was linked to more significant issues at the implant site seen on X-rays. These dogs had more areas of lucency, or gaps, around the implant, indicating potential instability. The study suggests that dogs with these gaps should be monitored closely for signs of implant loosening.
People also search for: dog hip replacement pain · signs of implant loosening in dogs · lameness after hip surgery in dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To radiographically evaluate the Zurich cementless total hip (ZCTH) cup and correlate lucency with clinical signs of implant instability, time since surgery, and implant generation, using zonal analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. ANIMALS: Client-owned dogs (n = 53). METHODS: Radiographs of dogs that had ZCTH arthroplasty (>1 year) were evaluated using zonal analysis, for lucency surrounding the cup-bone interface (number of zones, length, area). Dogs were examined for clinical signs of implant instability (lameness, hip pain). Lucency was correlated with lameness, time after surgery, and implant generation. RESULTS: Radiographs of 68 implants (18 generation I, 50 generation II) were evaluated. Eight dogs were lame (11.8%). Dogs with lameness were more likely to have lucency in > or =2 zones of analysis (per view), have >2 times the average curvilinear length of lucency, and have >4 times the average area of lucency surrounding the implant compared with non-lame dogs. A weak relationship was observed between time after surgery and implant generation; however, there was no relationship between time after surgery and lucency. CONCLUSIONS: Dogs with lameness after ZCTH arthroplasty were more likely to have lucency at the cup-bone interface. Lucency was better evaluated by radiographic projection than zonal analysis. Temporal progression of lucency was weakly correlated with implant generation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dogs with lucency in > or =2 zones of analysis should be evaluated more frequently for clinical signs of implant loosening. Further investigation of serial radiographs after ZCTH arthroplasty is warranted.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16911155/