Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Do antimicrobial-coated sutures reduce surgical infections in dogs
By Thieman Mankin, Kelley M & Cohen, Noah D·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2020·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Randomized, controlled clinical trial to assess the effect of antimicrobial-impregnated suture on the incidence of surgical site infections in dogs and cats.
Plain-English summary
A study involving 862 pets, including 794 dogs and 68 cats, looked at whether using special antimicrobial sutures could help prevent infections after surgery. The pets were divided into two groups: one received regular sutures, while the other had sutures coated with an antimicrobial agent. After surgery, about 6% of pets in both groups developed surgical site infections, showing no significant difference in infection rates between the two types of sutures. This suggests that using antimicrobial sutures may not be more effective than regular sutures in preventing infections after surgery.
People also search for: dog surgery infection prevention · cat surgical site infection · antimicrobial suture effectiveness
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prophylactic efficacy of triclosan-coated (TC) suture in preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) in dogs and cats undergoing surgical procedures. ANIMALS: 862 animals (794 dogs and 68 cats). PROCEDURES: Incidences of SSI of surgical wounds closed with TC suture and surgical wounds closed with non-TC suture occurring between the time of surgery and 1 month postoperatively were compared. Animals were randomly assigned to TC or non-TC suture groups. When TC suture was assigned, all suture available as TC material was used rather than non-TC suture. Presence of an SSI was determined by an owner questionnaire or direct examination. RESULTS: Overall, 50 of 862 (5.8%) animals developed SSIs. Incidence of SSI was 6% (24/428) in the non-TC suture group and 6% (26/434) in the TC suture group. No significant difference was found in the incidence of SSI between groups. No significant difference was detected in the incidence of incisional problems (eg, redness, dehiscence, and seroma formation) between animals in which TC suture was used and those in which non-TC suture was used. On multivariable analysis, other factors were associated with increased SSI rates, including an incision length > 10 cm, surgery performed by the soft tissue surgery department, and anesthesia duration of > 240 minutes. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: No significant difference in incidence of SSI was detected between animals undergoing surgical procedures performed with non-TC versus TC suture.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32538702/