Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Cisplatin and firocoxib treatment for bladder cancer in dogs
By Knapp, D W et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2013·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Randomized trial of cisplatin versus firocoxib versus cisplatin/firocoxib in dogs with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 44 dogs with urinary bladder cancer (transitional cell carcinoma) were treated with either cisplatin, a common chemotherapy drug, firocoxib, a pain medication, or a combination of both. The combination treatment showed a higher success rate, with over half of the dogs experiencing partial remission, compared to just 13% with cisplatin alone. While both treatments caused some kidney and gastrointestinal side effects, the combination did not increase these risks compared to cisplatin alone. Firocoxib also provided some benefits on its own, making it a potential option for managing this type of cancer in dogs.
People also search for: dog bladder cancer treatment · firocoxib for transitional cell carcinoma · cisplatin side effects in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cisplatin combined with a nonselective cyclooxygenase (cox) inhibitor has potent antitumor activity against transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) in dogs, but this treatment is limited by renal toxicosis. Cox-2 is expressed in TCC, but only in limited sites within the kidney. A cox-2 inhibitor could enhance the antitumor activity of cisplatin with potentially fewer adverse effects on the kidney. HYPOTHESIS: Cisplatin/cox-2 inhibitor treatment will have greater antitumor activity but no more renal toxicosis than cisplatin alone in dogs with TCC. ANIMALS: Forty-four dogs with naturally occurring urinary bladder TCC. METHODS: Dogs were randomized to receive cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) IV q21d), firocoxib (5 mg/kg PO q24h), or the combination. Tumor measurements were determined before and at 6-week intervals during treatment. Renal function was monitored by serum creatinine concentration, iohexol clearance, and urine specific gravity. Toxicoses were graded according to Veterinary Co-Operative Oncology Group (VCOG) criteria. RESULTS: The remission rate with cisplatin/firocoxib (57%) was significantly (P = .021) higher than that with cisplatin alone (13%). Renal and gastrointestinal toxicoses were common in dogs receiving cisplatin, but there were no significant differences between dogs receiving cisplatin or cisplatin/firocoxib. Firocoxib alone induced partial remission or stable disease in 20 and 33% of dogs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Firocoxib significantly enhanced the antitumor activity of cisplatin resulting in partial remission in more than half of the cases. The toxicoses inherent to cisplatin, however, were noted in dogs receiving this combination. Firocoxib had antitumor effects as a single agent and can be considered a palliative treatment for dogs with TCC.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23205923/