Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Fast test to detect Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and coagulans
By Murugesan, Ananda Chitra et al.·Published in Journal of microbiological methods·2025·Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Rapid detection of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Staphylococcus coagulans by combining fast VPCR with nucleic acid lateral flow immunoassay (NALFIA).
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study looked at how to quickly identify bacteria that cause skin infections (pyoderma) in dogs, specifically Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Staphylococcus coagulans. Researchers tested swab samples from affected dogs using two methods: a fast PCR test and a lateral flow immunoassay. The fast PCR method was more sensitive but required special equipment, while the lateral flow test was simpler and quicker, allowing for results in just 45 minutes. This new approach could help vets diagnose skin infections more efficiently, especially in places with limited resources.
People also search for: dog skin infection treatment · pyoderma in dogs · quick test for dog bacteria
Abstract
In dogs, pyoderma is primarily caused by coagulase-positive Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (SP), S. coagulans (SC) and S. aureus (SA). Standard culture and biochemical methods for identifying these organisms are laborious, and potential misidentification is a possibility. Molecular methods, like PCR, are a viable alternative for early and accurate diagnosis of these organisms. In this study, we collected 83 swab samples from pyoderma cases of dogs and compared the sensitivity and specificity of the fast VPCR in conventional agarose gel electrophoresis with Nucleic Acid Lateral Flow Immunoassay (NALFIA) in detecting SP and SC. Bacterial DNA was extracted by a simple and quick NaOH lysis method. Primers targeting the rodA gene of SC and the spsK gene of SP were used in PCR, and labelled primers of the same genes were used in NALFIA. The limit of detection of SP and SC in VPCR with gel electrophoresis was 10 CFU/ml and 10 CFU/ml for NALFIA. Though VPCR with gel electrophoresis was found to be more sensitive than NALFIA, it required specialized equipment like agarose gel electrophoretic apparatus with power pack and gel documentation system and carcinogenic ethidium bromide dye for detection of the bands in agarose gel. The VPCR, combined with NALFIA, offers sensitive and reliable detection of these bacteria in 45 min, even to the naked eye. The simplicity, portability, and cost-effectiveness of the NALFIA make them particularly suitable for resource-limited settings and point-of-care testing.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40957501/