PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Bacterial tests to diagnose gum disease in dogs

By Wallis, C V et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2024·Waltham Petcare Science Institute, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Real-world diagnostic potential of bacterial biomarkers of canine periodontitis.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study looked at how well a new test could detect gum disease (periodontitis) in dogs by comparing it to regular oral exams done by veterinarians. They collected plaque samples from 127 dogs while they were under anesthesia and found that a visual exam identified about 68% of dogs with gum disease, but the more thorough exam under anesthesia showed that nearly 87% actually had it. The new test was fairly accurate, correctly identifying gum disease in about 78% to 81% of cases. This suggests that using this test could help vets catch gum disease earlier, leading to better dental health for dogs.

People also search for: dog gum disease symptoms · how to treat periodontitis in dogs · dog dental health test

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic potential of bacterial biomarkers by comparing the performance of molecular detection assays with clinical assessments of dog's oral health performed by veterinarians. METHODS: Supragingival and subgingival plaque samples were collected from 127 client-owned dogs, pre-booked for procedures under general anesthesia, visiting veterinary practices in the United States. DNA was extracted and bacterial biomarkers quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Gingivitis and periodontitis were recorded by a trained clinician using the Weighted Gingivitis Periodontitis Score which involved assessing the buccal surfaces of 18 teeth while under general anesthesia. Intraoral dental radiographs of the left and right mandibular first molar teeth were also obtained. These data were then used to establish the diagnostic performance of the molecular assay to detect periodontitis. RESULTS: An initial conscious, visual oral examination performed by the veterinarian identified 67.7% of dogs as having periodontitis, but examination under general anesthesia indicated a higher proportion (86.6%). Analysis of supragingival plaque samples collected by veterinarians from conscious and unconscious dogs demonstrated the assay had an accuracy of 77.7 to 80.9%, a sensitivity of 77.6 to 81.0%, and a specificity of 80.0%. DISCUSSION: Use of this molecular screening tool in conscious dogs has the potential to improve early periodontal disease detection and support veterinary decision making, ultimately improving the oral health of dogs and consequently their quality of life.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39109343/