Reconsidering Rehabilitation and Lifestyle Approaches to Improve Quality of Life in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Scoping Review.

Abstract

<i>Background</i>: Multiple sclerosis (MS) involves complex physical, cognitive and behavioral challenges that collectively affect quality of life. Integrating lifestyle components such as sleep optimization, dietary behaviors, stress management, and self-management strategies into rehabilitation may enhance outcomes beyond traditional approaches. This scoping review aimed to map rehabilitation interventions that combine psychomotor, cognitive, lifestyle-focused, or multimodal elements and assess quality of life in adults with MS. <i>Methods</i>: This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, which guided the identification, screening, and selection of studies. Screening and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. From 135 records, nine primary studies and four secondary evidence sources were included. <i>Results</i>: Most studies involved adults with mild-to-moderate disability and predominantly relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Physical or motor rehabilitation interventions were examined in five studies, while two studies evaluated multimodal rehabilitation programs, one study focused on cognitive rehabilitation, and one study investigated lifestyle-oriented or self-management-integrated approaches. Quality of life was assessed in all included studies, with improvements reported across multiple domains. Fatigue-related outcomes were reported in four studies, sleep-related outcomes in three studies, and digitally delivered or hybrid rehabilitation interventions were implemented in three studies, indicating an emerging trend toward technology-supported rehabilitation approaches. <i>Conclusions</i>: Contemporary MS rehabilitation is moving toward multidimensional, holistic models that integrate lifestyle components. Standardized outcomes, inclusion of more diverse MS phenotypes, and rigorous evaluation of integrated frameworks are required to strengthen the evidence base and inform clinical practice.