PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Can mousse products help treat skin infections in dogs?

By Ramos, Sara J et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2019·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Residual antibacterial activity of canine hair treated with five mousse products against Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in vitro.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

Fifteen dogs with no skin issues were tested with five different mousse products to see how well they could fight a common skin infection caused by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. After applying the mousses, three of them showed strong antibacterial effects that lasted for up to 10 days, while two did not show any significant benefits. This suggests that certain mousse products can help manage skin infections in dogs for a period after application. If your dog has skin problems, ask your vet about using mousse treatments that have shown effectiveness against bacterial infections.

People also search for: dog skin infection treatment · best mousse for dog pyoderma · Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in dogs

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Topical therapy alone can be effective in the treatment of canine pyoderma. Topical products are commercially available as shampoos, sprays, wipes and mousses. To date, no studies have evaluated the efficacy of commercially available mousse products in the treatment of canine pyoderma. OBJECTIVE: To determine the residual antibacterial activity of canine hairs treated with mousse products containing different active ingredients. ANIMALS: Fifteen client-owned dogs with no history of dermatological disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dogs were treated once with five mousse products [(i) 2% chlorhexidine and 1% ketoconazole, (ii) 2% chlorhexidine and 2% miconazole, (iii) 3% chlorhexidine and 0.5% climbazole, (iv) 2% salicylic acid 10% ethyl lactate and (v) phytosphingosine HCl 0.05%; control]. Hair samples were collected from each treatment area before application, one hour after application and on days 2, 4, 7, 10 and 14 post-treatment. Collected hairs were weighed and plated on Mueller-Hinton agar plates streaked with a Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolate showing no antimicrobial resistance. Plates were incubated for 24 h and bacterial growth inhibition zones around the hairs were measured. RESULTS: Mousses 1, 2 and 3 created significant inhibition zones up to Day 10 when compared to pre-treatment samples. On Day 14, only mousse 3 produced a significant zone of inhibition when compared to the pre-treatment sample. Mousses 4 and 5 showed no statistical difference between any of the samples. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: These results suggest that three of the mousse products had residual activity in inhibiting S. pseudintermedius growth in vitro for at least 10 days.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30887651/