Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Respiratory Delivery of <i>Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus</i> GG by Vibrating-Mesh and Jet Nebulisation.
- Year:
- 2024
- Authors:
- Byun AS et al.
- Affiliation:
- Faculty of Medicine and Health · Australia
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>The use of probiotic bacteria to improve lung health has been gaining interest. Although the oral delivery of probiotics and their effects are well documented, there is currently limited knowledge on the respiratory delivery of probiotics.<h4>Objectives</h4>This study aimed to investigate whether nebulisation is suitable for delivering <i>Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus</i> GG (LGG) into the lungs for the potential treatment of bacterial pulmonary infections.<h4>Methods</h4>It compared the dose output and aerosol performance of a vibrating-mesh nebuliser (VMN) and a jet nebuliser (JN) in nebulising LGG suspended in de Man Rogosa Sharpe (MRS) broth, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), or normal saline (0.9% <i>w</i>/<i>v</i> sodium chloride in water).<h4>Results</h4>The VMN consistently produced a higher output than the JN for all liquid media, indicating that VMN was more efficient. The fine-particle fractions of both nebulisers were comparable for a given medium. The highest fine-particle fraction was achieved with LGG suspended in MRS broth for both nebulisers (20.5 ± 2.8% for VMN; 18.7 ± 3.4% for JN). This suggests that the aerosol performance of nebulised probiotics may depend on the medium in which the probiotic bacteria were suspended.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Therefore, this study demonstrated that the nebulisation efficiency of LGG depended on the nebuliser type and liquid medium of the probiotic suspension.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://europepmc.org/article/MED/39458655