Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Ammonium urate bladder stones in dogs with liver shunts 2010-2023
By Walton-Clark, M et al.·Published in The Journal of small animal practice·2025·Eastcott Referrals, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Retrospective analysis of the incidence and clinicopathological findings associated with ammonium urate urolithiasis in dogs with congenital portosystemic shunts: 363 cases (2010-2023).
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with congenital portosystemic shunts, a condition where blood bypasses the liver, were found to have a high incidence of ammonium urate stones in their urinary tract. These dogs often showed symptoms like blood in their urine and were typically older, with many being neutered males. The study revealed that dogs with extrahepatic shunts were more likely to develop these stones compared to those with intrahepatic shunts. Treatment options for these dogs may include managing their diet and addressing the underlying liver condition to reduce the risk of stone formation.
People also search for: dog blood in urine · portosystemic shunt treatment · ammonium urate stones in dogs · neutered male dog urinary problems
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence and clinical findings associated with the presence of ammonium urate urolithiasis in dogs with congenital portosystemic shunts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of dogs diagnosed with extrahepatic portosystemic shunts or intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in 15 referral hospitals between 2010 and 2023. Data including signalment, clinical signs, physical examination findings and clinicopathologic test results at the time of the diagnosis were collected, and the presence of ammonium urate urolithiasis was recorded. RESULTS: A total of 363 dogs were included. The overall incidence of ammonium urate urolithiasis was 19.3%. Dogs with extrahepatic portosystemic shunts were more likely to have urolithiasis compared to those with intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (32.2% vs. 8.0%). Dogs with urolithiasis were older (median 40 vs. 8 months) and more likely to be neutered males (51.4% vs. 9.8%). Ammonia was significantly lower in dogs with urolithiasis. Dogs with urolithiasis were more likely to have haematuria on dipstick analysis and sediment examination. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Dogs with extrahepatic portosystemic shunts were more likely to have urolithiasis when compared to dogs with intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Dogs with higher ammonia levels were less likely to have ammonium urate urolithiasis, and older dogs, neutered males, or those with evidence of haematuria had an increased incidence of urolithiasis.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39805266/