PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Where dogs bleed most from rat poison poisoning cases 2010-2020

By Stroope, Sarah et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2022·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Retrospective Evaluation of Clinical Bleeding in Dogs With Anticoagulant Rodenticide Toxicity-A Multi-Center Evaluation of 62 Cases (2010-2020).

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 62 dogs with bleeding issues were diagnosed with poisoning from anticoagulant rodenticides, which are common rat poisons. The dogs showed signs of bleeding in various areas, including the chest, abdomen, and skin. Many had bleeding in more than one location, but the specific sites of bleeding did not affect their chances of recovery or need for blood transfusions. Treatment typically involved supportive care, and while the outcomes varied, understanding the common bleeding sites can help veterinarians manage these cases more effectively.

People also search for: dog bleeding from rat poison · anticoagulant rodenticide symptoms in dogs · treatment for dog hemorrhage

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the most common locations of hemorrhage in dogs diagnosed with anticoagulant rodenticide intoxication. ANIMALS: Dogs presenting with hemorrhage secondary to anticoagulant rodenticide intoxication between at two university veterinary teaching hospitals. PROCEDURES: Medical records were searched from the years 2010 through 2020 and all records from dogs treated for hemorrhage secondary to anticoagulant rodenticide intoxication were reviewed. Dogs were diagnosed with anticoagulant rodenticide intoxication based on the combination of known exposure and prolonged coagulation testing, including prothrombin and activated thromboplastin time, or based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS). The diagnosis of hemorrhage was made based on physical exam findings, point-of-care ultrasound findings or radiography. RESULTS: Sixty-two dogs met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. The most common sites of hemorrhage included: pleural space (hemothorax 37%), pulmonary parenchyma (24%), abdomen (24%), skin/subcutaneous (21%), gastrointestinal tract (18%), pericardium (13%), oral cavity (13%), nasal cavity (11%), ocular (8%), and urinary tract (7%). Overall, forty-five dogs (73%) had evidence of cutaneous or mucosal hemorrhage while thirty-three (53%) of dogs had evidence of cavitary hemorrhage. Forty-five percent of dogs had hemorrhage noted at only one site, while 55% experienced hemorrhage at more than one site. The location of hemorrhage and total number of hemorrhagic sites was not associated with survival or transfusion requirement. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In conclusion, this study highlights that dogs with anticoagulant rodenticide intoxication present with diverse locations of hemorrhage and the majority of dogs had non-cavitary hemorrhage noted.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35677932/