Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Dog surgery for stomach or intestine blockage by foreign objects
By Hoffman, Christopher L et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)·2022·Department of Clinical Studies, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Retrospective evaluation of gastrointestinal foreign bodies and presurgical predictors for enterectomy versus enterotomy in dogs (2013-2016): 82 cases.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 82 dogs with gastrointestinal foreign body (GIFB) obstruction were evaluated to determine which dogs needed more extensive surgery. Dogs that were more ill, had not eaten for longer, and had severe vomiting were more likely to require a more invasive procedure called enterectomy (EC) instead of a simpler enterotomy (EO). The study found that dogs with higher heart rates and more severe vomiting were more likely to need the enterectomy. Understanding these signs can help pet owners recognize when their dog might need urgent care.
People also search for: dog vomiting treatment · signs of dog intestinal blockage · dog surgery for foreign body
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate preoperative diagnostics in dogs with gastrointestinal foreign body (GIFB) obstruction and to identify clinical variables associated with the performance of simple enterotomy (EO) versus enterectomy (EC). DESIGN: Retrospective case control study from October 2013 to January 2016. SETTING: Veterinary Teaching Hospital. ANIMALS: Eighty-two client-owned dogs diagnosed at the time of surgery with GIFB obstruction. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were collected from medical records regarding history, initial physical examination, clinicopathologic testing, diagnostic imaging, and surgical reports. Based on univariate analysis, dogs that required EC were ill (P < 0.0001) and anorexic (P = 0.0007) for a longer duration; had a higher vomiting severity score (P = 0.005); and had worse perfusion parameters (mucous membrane color [P = 0.028] and quality [P = 0.032], poorer pulse quality [P = 0.0015], relatively lower blood pressure [P = 0.0328], greater heart rates [P = 0.0011]). Dogs undergoing EC were more likely to have altered peritoneal detail on radiographs (P = 0.0014; odds ratio [OR] = 25.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.4, 275.7) and echogenic peritoneal effusion on ultrasound (P = 0.0101; OR = 12.5; 95% CI: 1.3, 120.9), compared to the EO group. Heart rate (adjusted P = 0.028; OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.0, 1.1) and vomiting severity score (adjusted P = 0.028; OR = 5.6; 95% CI: 1.2, 26.1) maintained significance after multiple logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors in the preoperative clinical evaluation were different between dogs undergoing EO versus EC for GIFB obstruction. However, many of these variables become insignificant with multiple logistic regression. The presence of an increased heart rate or increased vomiting severity score at presentation was independently associated with undergoing enterectomy. Prospective studies with greater number of animals are warranted to validate these results.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34555866/