PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Survival and outcomes in diabetic cats with nonketotic hyperosmolar

By Judy, Annalisa et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)·2025·University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Retrospective Evaluation of Prognostic Variables and Overall Survival Associated With Nonketotic Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemia in Diabetic Cats: 29 Cases (2000-2020).

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A group of 29 diabetic cats was diagnosed with a serious condition called nonketotic hyperosmolar hyperglycemia (HHS), which means their blood sugar levels were extremely high but they didn't have ketones in their blood. The study found that about 65.5% of these cats survived, similar to those with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), another serious condition. Factors like high blood urea nitrogen, high creatinine, and low sodium levels were linked to lower chances of survival. However, no specific blood tests or the type of insulin used seemed to predict how well the cats would do.

People also search for: diabetic cat high blood sugar treatment · cat hyperglycemia survival rate · diabetic ketoacidosis vs hyperosmolar hyperglycemia in cats

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare survival between cats diagnosed with a nonketotic hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS) and cats diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and to determine whether clinical parameters, clinicopathologic data, and insulin type are associated with survival. Secondary objectives were to evaluate whether these parameters were associated with survival in cats undergoing a generalized hyperglycemic diabetic crisis. DESIGN: Retrospective evaluation of medical records of cats diagnosed with DKA and HHS between 2000 and 2020. SETTING: University teaching hospital. ANIMALS: The HHS group consisted of 29 cats (blood glucose concentration [BG] &#x2265;31.08&#xa0;mmol/L [&#x2265;560&#xa0;mg/dL]; calculated serum osmolality &#x2265;350&#xa0;mOsm/kg; ketone negative). The DKA group consisted of 71 cats (BG &#x2265;7.77&#xa0;mmol/L [&#x2265;140&#xa0;mg/dL]; pH <7.35; ketone positive). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: No clinicopathologic parameters or previous use of glargine U-100 were significantly associated with survival in the HHS group. There was no difference in survival of the HHS group versus the DKA group (65.5% vs. 68.6%; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.85). In all cats, higher serum BUN (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.014), creatinine (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0098), or BG (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.015) and lower serum sodium concentration (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.03) or body temperature (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0098) were associated with decreased odds of survival. Calculated total and effective osmolalities were not associated with survival in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Cats with HHS had a survival of 65.5% in this study. No serum biochemical parameters predicted prognosis for the HHS group, and insulin type was not found to be associated with survival. Azotemia, hyponatremia, hyperglycemia, and hypothermia were associated with decreased survival when combining all cats. Hyperosmolality was not associated with survival; therefore, distinguishing HHS and DKA into separate syndromes may be arbitrary.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40880442/