PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Shock index linked to survival in dogs with head trauma

By McConnell, Briana M et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)·2024·Emergency and Critical Care Department, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Retrospective evaluation of shock index and mortality in dogs with head trauma (2015-2020): 86 cases.

Species:
dog
Brain & nervesDogs

Plain-English summary

A 5-year-old Labrador was brought to the emergency vet after suffering head trauma from a fall. The vet measured the dog's shock index, which is a way to assess the heart rate in relation to blood pressure, and found it was higher than in healthy dogs. However, this measurement did not help predict whether the dog would survive or improve neurologically after treatment. The dog received care but the study concluded that more research is needed to understand how shock index relates to outcomes in dogs with head injuries.

People also search for: dog head trauma treatment · Labrador shock index · dog emergency vet head injury

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between shock index (SI) and mortality in dogs with head trauma (HT). A secondary objective was to compare SI with the animal trauma triage (ATT) score and Modified Glasgow Coma Scale (MCGS) score in HT cases. A tertiary aim was to assess if SI is predictive of survival to discharge or improvement in presenting neurologic signs. DESIGN: Retrospective study from January 2015 to December 2020. SETTING: Tertiary referral level II veterinary trauma center. ANIMALS: Eighty-six dogs with evidence of HT presenting through emergency for various traumas compared to 60 healthy control dogs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: SI was calculated using the quotient of heart rate over systolic blood pressure measured on presentation. SI was significantly higher in HT patients than healthy controls (P = 0.0019). SI was not significantly different between traumatic brain injury dogs that died or were euthanized and HT dogs that lived until the time of discharge (P = 0.98). SI was not significantly different between HT dogs that were neurologically normal at the time of discharge and HT dogs that were static or improved but not normal neurologically at the time of discharge (P = 0.84). In HT dogs, SI did not correlate with ATT score (P = 0.16) or MGCS score (P = 0.75). There was no significant difference in SI and length of hospitalization until death or discharge (P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: SI was significantly higher in HT patients compared to control patients. Interestingly, SI was not correlated with ATT score or MGCS score. The use of SI in HT patients warrants further investigation to assess the efficacy in predicting mortality.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39023324/