Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Cat c-section anesthesia with alfaxalone or propofol effects
By Lambertini, Carlotta et al.·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgery·2024·Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Italy·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Retrospective evaluation of the induction of anaesthesia with alfaxalone or propofol in cats undergoing caesarean section.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of cats undergoing emergency c-sections received either alfaxalone or propofol for anesthesia. Out of 14 cats, 50 kittens were born, with a survival rate of 90% at birth. The kittens whose mothers were given alfaxalone had a higher survival rate at both birth and 24 hours after. Both anesthesia options were found to be effective for the procedure, ensuring the safety of the mothers and their kittens.
People also search for: cat c-section anesthesia · alfaxalone vs propofol for cats · kitten survival after c-section · emergency c-section in cats
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Several anaesthetic protocols for caesarean section (c-section) have been described in dogs; however, anaesthesiological studies in cats undergoing c-section are lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the viability and outcome of kittens born from queens undergoing emergency c-section and receiving propofol or alfaxalone for anaesthetic induction and isoflurane for maintenance of general anaesthesia. METHODS: All cats admitted to the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of the University of Bologna between January 2014 and December 2022 for dystocia that had undergone an emergency c-section were analysed in this retrospective study. The queens received propofol 2-6 mg/kg IV (group P) or alfaxalone 1-3 mg/kg IV (group A) administered slowly; general anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane. Survival of all the kittens was evaluated at birth and after 24 h; in addition, heart rate, respiratory rate and mucous membrane colour were evaluated in the kittens at birth. RESULTS: Of the 14 cats included in the study, eight received alfaxalone (group A) and six received propofol (group P) for induction of the general anaesthesia. A total of 50 kittens were born by c-section: 30 kittens in group A and 20 in group P. The overall survival of the kittens was 90% at birth: 96.7% (29/30) for group A and 80% (16/20) for group P. The 24 h survival rate was 93.1% for group A and 87.5% for group P. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of the present study demonstrated that in cats undergoing c-section, both alfaxalone and propofol are feasible for the induction of general anaesthesia.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39560346/