Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Retrospective evaluation of the use of hydrocortisone for treatment of suspected critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) in dogs with septic shock (2010-2017): 47 cases.
- Journal:
- Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)
- Year:
- 2021
- Authors:
- Summers, April M et al.
- Affiliation:
- Cornell University Hospital for Animals · United States
- Species:
- dog
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate characteristics of septic shock patients treated with hydrocortisone (HC) due to suspicion of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) as compared to septic shock patients without suspicion of CIRCI. DESIGN: Retrospective study between February 2010 and October 2017. SETTING: University teaching hospital ICU. ANIMALS: Data were collected for 47 dogs with septic shock. Twenty-one dogs were treated with HC (HC-treated) due to suspicion of CIRCI. Twenty-six dogs did not receive HC (non-HC-treated). INTERVENTIONS: HC was administered either as an intermittent IV bolus or as a constant rate infusion (CRI) to those patients with suspected CIRCI. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Significantly higher baseline APPLEscores and predicted mortality were detected in the HC-treated patients compared to non-HC-treated patients (0.87 vs 0.44 for predicted mortality, P = 0.039). Patients in the HC-treated group were on more vasopressors and cardiotonics than those in the non-HC-treated group (2.5 vs 1.5, P <0 .001). All patients initially responded to vasopressor administration, with average time to resolution of hypotension being 90 minutes for the HC-treated group compared to 60 minutes for the non-HC-treated group (P = 0.640). However, HC-treated patients took significantly longer to have a sustained resolution (a systolic blood pressure > 90 mm Hg or a mean blood pressure > 65 mm Hg for at least 4 h) of their hypotension after starting vasopressors, as compared to their non-HC-treated counterparts (8.5 vs 4 h, P = 0.001). Three (14.3%) HC-treated patients survived to discharge compared to 9 (34.6%) non-HC-treated patients, but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: HC-treated patients had a higher baseline risk of mortality than non-HC-treated patients. There was no significant difference in survival between the HC-treated and non-HC-treated septic shock patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the use of HC in patients with suspected CIRCI.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33599090/