Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Vacuum drainage treatment for septic peritonitis in dogs and cats
By Cioffi, Krista M et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)·2012·Department of Small Animal Surgery at the University of Georgia Veterinary Teaching Hospital, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Retrospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted peritoneal drainage for the treatment of septic peritonitis in dogs and cats: 8 cases (2003-2010).
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of six dogs and two cats suffering from septic peritonitis (a severe abdominal infection) underwent surgery and received a treatment called vacuum-assisted peritoneal drainage (VAPD) to help manage their condition. The pets showed symptoms for an average of four days before surgery, and VAPD was used for about two days afterward to drain fluid from their abdomens. Unfortunately, only three of the pets, all dogs, survived, while the others faced complications such as heart failure and severe infection. This treatment can help with drainage but comes with risks like infection and low protein levels in the blood.
People also search for: dog septic peritonitis treatment · cat abdominal infection symptoms · VAPD for dogs recovery
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of vacuum-assisted peritoneal drainage (VAPD) in dogs and cats with septic peritonitis. DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study. SETTING: University Veterinary Teaching Hospital. ANIMALS: Six dogs and 2 cats with septic peritonitis. INTERVENTIONS: Application of VAPD after abdominal exploration. MEASUREMENTS: Pre- and post-operative physical and clinicopathologic data, surgical findings, treatment, VAPD fluid production, outcome, and survival are reported. MAIN RESULTS: Eight nonconsecutive cases of septic peritonitis, consisting of 6 dogs and 2 cats, were treated surgically and had VAPD applied post-operatively. The mean duration of clinical signs prior to surgical intervention was 4 ± 3 days. VAPD therapy was applied for a mean of 2 ± 1.1 days and collected a median of 27 mL/kg/d of abdominal effusate. The median time in hospital was 5 days and abdominal closure was completed in 5 of the 8 patients. All specimens collected at surgery cultured positive for bacteria, most commonly Enterococcus spp. The peritoneum of 4 animals was cultured at the time of abdominal closure; 1 was negative and 3 were positive for Escherichia coli, Enterococcus spp. or gram-positive cocci. Cultures before and after surgery differed in 2 patients. Hypoproteinemia was present in all patients postoperatively. Three patients were considered survivors, all of which were dogs. Five patients died or were euthanized due to cardiopulmonary arrest (n = 3), pyothorax (n = 1), and acute, severe, septic peritonitis (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: VAPD is available for maintaining abdominal drainage for the treatment of septic peritonitis after surgical intervention; however, similar to open abdominal drainage and closed suction drainage, nosocomial infection and hypoproteinemia remain challenges in the treatment of septic peritonitis.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22931241/