Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
High-velocity nasal oxygen treatment in cats with breathing problems
By Wampfler, A et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)·2026·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Retrospective Report of the Use and Outcome of High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation in Cats (2019-2022): Eight Cases.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
Eight cats with serious breathing problems that didn't improve with regular oxygen therapy were treated with a method called high-velocity nasal insufflation (HVNI). This technique helped provide more effective oxygen support for conditions like severe lung disease and asthma. The cats spent an average of 17 hours on this treatment, and while three of them were able to stop HVNI successfully, only two survived to go home. Overall, the cats tolerated the treatment well without any complications, suggesting that HVNI can be a helpful option for cats needing extra respiratory support.
People also search for: cat breathing problems treatment · high-velocity nasal insufflation for cats · cat asthma oxygen therapy
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the use and feasibility of high-velocity nasal insufflation (HVNI) in cats. DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study from 2019 to 2022. SETTING: University teaching hospital. ANIMALS: Eight cats that failed traditional oxygen therapy and, based on clinical evaluation, required more aggressive oxygen supplementation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eight cats had HVNI instituted between 2019 and 2022. Four cats received HVNI for primary pulmonary disease, including two with severe nodular pulmonary patterns, one with acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to septic shock, and one with diffuse hepatization of multiple lung lobes. Two cats received HVNI for airway disease, including one with feline asthma and one with chronic bronchiolar injury. One cat received HVNI due to pleural space disease secondary to failed herniorrhaphy repair for a peritoneal-pericardial diaphragmatic hernia, and one had an unknown cause of respiratory distress. No cat received HVNI due to cardiac disease. The median time spent on HVNI was 17 h (range, 2-76 h). The median flow rate was 1 L/kg (range, 0.612-2.68 L/kg). The median highest FiOrecorded was 100% (range, 50%-100%), and the median lowest was 52.5% (range, 40%-100%). Three cats had HVNI successfully discontinued, and two cats survived to discharge. All cats tolerated HVNI with no reported complications. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report to evaluate the use of HVNI for respiratory support in cats, demonstrating that HVNI is a feasible option in cats requiring more aggressive respiratory support than traditional oxygen therapy.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41582885/