Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Treating esophageal narrowing in dogs and cats with bougienage risks
By Bissett, Sally A et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2009·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Risk factors and outcome of bougienage for treatment of benign esophageal strictures in dogs and cats: 28 cases (1995-2004).
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 20 dogs and 8 cats with a condition called benign esophageal stricture (BES), which makes it hard for them to swallow, underwent a treatment called bougienage to help them eat solid food again. Most pets showed good results, with 14 dogs and 6 cats able to eat solid food without regurgitating more than once a week after the procedure. While there were some complications, including one cat that had a nonfatal esophageal perforation, the overall outcome was positive, and the treatment was considered safe and effective.
People also search for: dog swallowing problems treatment · cat esophageal stricture symptoms · bougienage for cats · dog vomiting after anesthesia · cat eating difficulties solutions
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine outcome of bougienage for treatment of benign esophageal stricture (BES) in dogs and cats and identify risk factors for the condition. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. ANIMALS: 20 dogs and 8 cats with BES. PROCEDURES: Medical records were reviewed for information on signalment, clinical features, and outcome. Long-term outcome information was obtained with a questionnaire. RESULTS: Esophageal bougienage was performed with dilators ranging from 5 to 15 mm in diameter; median numbers of bougienage procedures were 3 (dogs) and 4.5 (cats). A good outcome, defined as tolerance of solid food with regurgitation less than once a week, was achieved in 14 dogs and 6 cats. Complications were minimal, with nonfatal esophageal perforation occurring in 1 cat. Four dogs and 1 cat were euthanized or died because of esophageal disease. Dogs with BES were more likely to be female, have a recent history of general anesthesia, have received an antimicrobial orally, or have a history of vomiting than were dogs in a reference population. Cats with BES were more likely to have a recent history of general anesthesia, vomiting, or gastrointestinal tract trichobezoars than were cats in a reference population. Doxycycline-induced esophagitis was the suspected cause of BES in 3 cats. Although general anesthesia was associated with development of BES in 18 dogs and 5 cats, concurrent potential causes of esophageal injury were common. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggested that esophageal bougienage was a safe and effective treatment for most dogs and cats with BES, with outcomes similar to those reported for balloon dilation.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19793015/