Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Risk factors for death in dogs with esophageal foreign bodies
By Burton, A G et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2017·IDEXX Laboratories Inc.·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Risk Factors for Death in Dogs Treated for Esophageal Foreign Body Obstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 222 Cases (1998-2017).
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 222 dogs was treated for esophageal foreign body obstruction, which occurs when something gets stuck in the esophagus, causing symptoms like gagging or difficulty swallowing. Most of the foreign objects were bones, and the majority of dogs were treated with endoscopy, a procedure that uses a camera to remove the obstruction. While the overall risk of death was low, those that required surgery had a significantly higher risk. Complications after treatment, such as esophageal perforation or bleeding, also increased the chance of death. Fortunately, most dogs that survived did not have long-term issues.
People also search for: dog esophageal obstruction treatment · signs of foreign body in dog · dog surgery complications · what to do if dog is gagging · esophageal stricture in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited data exist describing risk factors for death, and long-term outcomes in dogs with esophageal foreign body (EFB) obstruction. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate short- and long-term outcomes, and analyze risk factors for death in dogs with EFB obstruction. We hypothesized duration of entrapment and treatment type would affect outcome. ANIMALS: A total of 222 dogs were treated for EFB obstruction at an emergency and referral hospital between March 1998 and March 2017. METHODS: Medical records for dogs with EFB were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Foreign material most frequently was osseous (180/222 [81%]), with distal esophagus the most common location (110/222 [49.5%]). Duration of clinical signs was not associated with risk of death (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.99-1.17; P = 0.2). Entrapment was treated by endoscopy (204/222 [91.8%]), surgery after endoscopic attempt (13/222 [5.9%]), and repeat endoscopy after surgery was recommended but declined (5/222 [2.3%]). In-hospital case fatality rate was 11/222 (5%). Risk of death was significantly higher with surgery (OR = 20.1, 95% CI 3.59-112.44; P = 0.001), and 5/5 (100%) of dogs died if undergoing endoscopy after surgery was recommended but declined. Increasing numbers of postprocedural complications (OR = 3.44, CI 2.01-5.91; P < 0.001), esophageal perforation (OR = 65.47, CI 4.27-1004.15; P = 0.003), and postprocedure esophageal hemorrhage (OR = 11.81, CI 1.19-116.77; P = 0.04) increased in-hospital risk of death. Esophageal strictures were reported in 4/189 (2.1%) of survivors available for follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Death is uncommon in canine EFB; however, treatment type affects outcome, and these data should be used to guide decision-making in dogs with EFB.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29031028/