Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Risk of MRSP bacteria spreading from dogs to their owners
By Frank, Linda A et al.·Published in Veterinary dermatology·2009·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Risk of colonization or gene transfer to owners of dogs with meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study looked at the risk of pet owners getting infections from their dogs with skin infections caused by a resistant bacteria called meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP). Out of 25 dog-owner pairs, MRSP was found in 15 dogs, and two owners had the same bacteria in their noses. After treating the dogs for a month, MRSP was no longer found in the owners, suggesting that while owners can carry some resistant bacteria, the risk of getting MRSP from their dogs is low and usually temporary.
People also search for: dog skin infection treatment · MRSP in dogs · can I catch bacteria from my dog
Abstract
To determine the zoonotic risk from meticillin-resistant staphylococcal species or transfer of resistance genes between dogs with pyoderma and their owners, 25 dog-owner pairs were studied. Cultures were obtained from the dog's lesions and the owner's nasal cavity on the initial visit. Staphylococcus isolates were identified and antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Presence of the mecA gene was determined by PCR. Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome (SCCmec) typing was performed by multiplex PCR. Eighteen dogs had a meticillin-resistant staphylococcal species, with meticillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius (MRSP) isolated from 15 dogs. MRSP was isolated from two owners of dogs with MRSP skin infections. Both organisms had the same susceptibility pattern and SCCmec type. MRSP was not isolated from the owners after treating both dogs for 1 month. At least one coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. (CoNS) was isolated from each owner, with meticillin resistance found in 16 (64%) of the isolates. The mecA gene was identified in all but two of the meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. Multiplex PCR identified SCCmec type V in all MRSP. The mecA gene-possessing CoNS isolates from owners contained either SCCmec type IVa or IVc. In conclusion, MRSP colonization of owners appeared to be uncommon and transient. Human nasal carriage of meticillin-resistant CoNS was common, but the SCCmec types were different from those in the canine MRSP isolates. Owners do not appear to be at great risk of zoonotic transfer of organisms or antimicrobial resistance genes from dogs with MRSP infections, but the findings should be confirmed with a much larger cohort.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20178487/