PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Electrical stimulation of sacral roots to help dogs with spinal cord

By Chang, Shi-Min et al.·Published in World journal of gastroenterology·2005·Department of Orthopedic Surgery, China·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Sacral anterior root stimulated defecation in spinal cord injuries: an experimental study in canine model.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

Four dogs with spinal cord injuries were studied to see if electrical stimulation could help them defecate and urinate. After surgery to implant electrodes, the researchers found that stimulating the S2 nerve root was the most effective way to increase pressure in the rectum, helping the dogs to have bowel movements. The dogs were able to defecate and urinate with the help of a special device that controlled the stimulation. This approach shows promise for improving the quality of life for dogs with similar injuries.

People also search for: dog spinal cord injury treatment · how to help dog with bowel problems · electrical stimulation for dog defecation

Abstract

AIM: To investigate whether there was a dominant sacral root for the motive function of rectum and anal sphincter, and to provide an experimental basis for sacral root electrically stimulated defecation in spinal cord injuries. METHODS: Eleven spinal cord injured mongrel dogs were included in the study. After L4-L7 laminectomy, the bilateral L7-S3 roots were electrostimulated separately and rectal and sphincter pressure were recorded synchronously. Four animals were implanted electrodes on bilateral S2 roots. RESULTS: For rectal motorial innervation, S2 was the most dominant (mean 15.2 kPa, 37.7% of total pressure), S1 (11.3 kPa, 27.6%) and S3 (10.9 kPa, 26.7%) contributed to a smaller part. For external anal sphincter, S3 (mean 17.2 kPa, 33.7%) was the most dominant, S2 (16.2 kPa, 31.6%) and S1 (14.3 kPa, 27.9%) contributed to a lesser but still a significant part. Above 85% L7 roots provided some functional contribution to rectum and anal sphincter. For both rectum and sphincter, the right sacral roots provided more contribution than the left roots. Postoperatively, the 4 dogs had electrically stimulated defecation and micturition under the control of the neuroprosthetic device. CONCLUSION: S2 root is the most dominant contributor to rectal pressure in dogs. Stimulation of bilateral S2 with implanted electrodes contributes to good micturition and defecation in dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15786558/