PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Safety and effectiveness of modified-live coronavirus vaccine in dogs

By Pratelli, A et al.·Published in Veterinary microbiology·2004·Department of Animal Health and Well-being, Italy·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Safety and efficacy of a modified-live canine coronavirus vaccine in dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 14 dogs were tested to see if a new modified-live vaccine for canine coronavirus would be safe and effective. The vaccine was given to some dogs either through an injection or through their nose, and none of the dogs showed any side effects. When the vaccinated dogs were later exposed to the virus, they did not get sick, while the unvaccinated dogs showed moderate illness and shed the virus for a longer time. This suggests that the vaccine is both safe and effective in preventing illness from canine coronavirus.

People also search for: dog coronavirus vaccine safety · canine coronavirus symptoms · how does dog vaccine work

Abstract

The safety and the efficacy of a modified-live (ML) canine coronavirus (CCoV) vaccine strain 257/98-3c was evaluated in 14 dogs seronegative and virus negative for CCoV. For the safety test, four dogs were inoculated, two by intramuscular and two by oronasal route, with 10 times the vaccinal dose. During the observation period (28 days) all dogs did not display any local or systemic reaction. For the efficacy test, eight dogs were vaccinated by intramuscular (four dogs-group A) or by oronasal route (four dogs-group B). Two dogs were maintained as non-vaccinated controls. In the dogs of group A, vaccinal virus was not detected in faecal samples by virus isolation (VI) and by PCR assay, while in the dogs of group B, the virus was revealed for six median days only by PCR. Twenty-eight days later, the vaccinated and control dogs were challenged with a field CCoV strain. After the challenge, the vaccinated dogs did not display clinical signs and the dogs of group A shed virus for 5.5 median days, evaluated by VI, and for 10 median days evaluated by PCR. Virus shedding was not observed, both by VI and PCR assay, in the dogs of group B. The two control dogs displayed moderate clinical signs and the virus was detected by VI for 14.5 median days starting from day 3 post-challenge (dpc 3) and by PCR assay for 23 median days starting from dpc 1.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15019110/